Re: legalese versus plain english
Peter Trapasso <peter.trapasso@eng.sun.com> Mon, 19 June 2000 16:54 UTC
Received: from mailbag.cps.intel.com (mailbag.cps.intel.com [192.102.199.72]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA14731 for <run-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:54:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailbag.intel.com (mailbag.cps.intel.com [192.102.199.72]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id JAA00270; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILBAG.INTEL.COM by MAILBAG.INTEL.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 233757 for IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:39:05 -0700
Received: from lukla.Sun.COM (lukla.Sun.COM [192.18.98.31]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id JAA00266 for <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by lukla.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04977 for <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:36:35 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ha-sims.eng.sun.com (phys-thestorka.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.1.231]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id JAA13337 for <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tomjones (tomjones.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.112.253]) by ha-sims.eng.sun.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.1999.06.13.00.20) with SMTP id <0FWE002GPU4X9K@ha-sims.eng.sun.com> for IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.3.5 SunOS 5.7 sun4u sparc
Content-type: TEXT/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-MD5: iBVmHNMgds2L6VsHYFkJ8Q==
Message-ID: <0FWE002GQU4X9K@ha-sims.eng.sun.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:34:09 -0700
Reply-To: Peter Trapasso <peter.trapasso@eng.sun.com>
Sender: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com>
From: Peter Trapasso <peter.trapasso@eng.sun.com>
Subject: Re: legalese versus plain english
Comments: To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com
To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com
I agree with Bill on the issue of linking. thanks, --------------------------------------------- Peter Trapasso Senior Web Marketing Specialist/Web Architect Internet Marketing Group Software Products and Platforms >Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:23:47 -0700 >From: Austin Bill-P23393 <Bill.Austin@MOTOROLA.COM> >Subject: Re: legalese versus plain english >To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com >MIME-version: 1.0 >Comments: To: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com> > >It is a very common practice to link to web sites without getting >permission. There have been a few cases where "deep linking" into the >middle of a site and making it look like it is your own content has caused a >lawsuit. > >Linking between related sites is the very nature of the web. They should >welcome the additional traffic as well as the increased "relevance rating" >they get on certain search engines from having additional links to their >site. > >-- >Bill Austin >Motorola Bluetooth http://www.motorola.com/bluetooth/ >Bluetooth Mailing List http://bluetooth.listbot.com/ > >Vote for MOT! -- Top Ten Bluetooth Sites >http://www.topsitelists.com/bestsites/bluetooth/topsites.cgi?ID=1 > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: JC Dill [mailto:jcdill@VO.CNCHOST.COM] >> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 9:07 AM >> To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com >> Subject: Re: legalese versus plain english >> >> >> On 05:47 AM 6/19/00, Ted Gavin wrote: >> >-----Original Message------ >> >From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@TORQUE.POTHOLE.COM> >> >To: IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM >> >Sent: June 19, 2000 11:26:23 AM GMT >> >Subject: Re: legalese versus plain english >> > >> >I think if we just state >> > >> >"spamming often constitutes a criminal act, and can result in >> >fines, imprisonment and civil lawsuits for damages" >> > >> >as Donald has laid out, we'll be fine. >> >> Perfect! >> >> Thanks gang! >> >> I'll work on sussing out the AOL cites and then I think we are set. >> >> Do we need to get permission from the various websites to include the >> reference URLs in the draft? >> >> jc >> >> > >> >If we need to cite anything in more specificity, we can do so in an >> >Appendix, can we not? >> > >> >Ted >>
- legalese versus plain english JC Dill
- Re: legalese versus plain english Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: legalese versus plain english Ted Gavin
- Re: legalese versus plain english JC Dill
- Re: legalese versus plain english Austin Bill-P23393
- Re: legalese versus plain english Peter Trapasso
- Re: legalese versus plain english Ted Gavin
- IETF in San Diego JC Dill