IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: legalese versus plain english

JC Dill <jcdill@vo.cnchost.com> Mon, 19 June 2000 16:27 UTC

Received: from mailbag.cps.intel.com (mailbag.cps.intel.com [192.102.199.72]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA13584 for <run-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:27:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailbag.intel.com (mailbag.cps.intel.com [192.102.199.72]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id JAA29794; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILBAG.INTEL.COM by MAILBAG.INTEL.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 233738 for IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:12:00 -0700
Received: from illustrious.cnchost.com (illustrious.concentric.net [207.155.252.7]) by mailbag.cps.intel.com (8.9.3/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id JAA29790 for <IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM>; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tango.vo.cnchost.com ([208.37.12.180]) by illustrious.cnchost.com id MAA06470; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:09:32 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.8]
Errors-To: <jcdill@vo.cnchost.com>
X-Sender: jcdill%vo.cnchost.com@pop3.vo.cnchost.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <4.3.2.20000619090616.02f2dee0@pop3.vo.cnchost.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:07:16 -0700
Reply-To: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com>
Sender: IETF-RUN <IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com>
From: JC Dill <jcdill@vo.cnchost.com>
Subject: Re: legalese versus plain english
To: IETF-RUN@mailbag.cps.intel.com
In-Reply-To: <385185384.961418846505.JavaMail.root@web623-wrb.mail.com>

On 05:47 AM 6/19/00, Ted Gavin wrote:
 >-----Original Message------
 >From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@TORQUE.POTHOLE.COM>
 >To: IETF-RUN@MAILBAG.INTEL.COM
 >Sent: June 19, 2000 11:26:23 AM GMT
 >Subject: Re: legalese versus plain english
 >
 >I think if we just state
 >
 >"spamming often constitutes a criminal act, and can result in
 >fines, imprisonment and civil lawsuits for damages"
 >
 >as Donald has laid out, we'll be fine.

Perfect!

Thanks gang!

I'll work on sussing out the AOL cites and then I think we are set.

Do we need to get permission from the various websites to include the
reference URLs in the draft?

jc

 >
 >If we need to cite anything in more specificity, we can do so in an
 >Appendix, can we not?
 >
 >Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email