Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
"Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear@cisco.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <elear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40233A2378; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fym6Wxd4; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=afXqa6pD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgt0YSEEYsKP; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF34A3A238E; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2095; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1618340420; x=1619550020; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=oTvnQtiIFHc3HdRfLVvV/1kGxT58VLv3kUxU975cVEI=; b=fym6Wxd4no6U16Um4T0YRc9kbwiTHUAYQFB81Czqto5eZN0K40Oqas+h ZS7zeZEwZM7ejfFXvD2SEL8oYpQRXNaHKWbVPTWxTL3JjjFtdwOc8UCAA H4ORNrBoISS0nFJFToQLhpiMRsWm+Cycz6HU8QStzSvNQF4Guj0/fKkZP k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:Kzv4dRQ6OL1m3FcqSQ8YtcJAi9pso2XLVj590bIulq5Of6K//p/rIE3Y47B3gUTUWZnAg9pCiuXWr7/pRWcA6oeLvWoZfZdRTR4ZmIMdmAlzSMKGCEiuKvnsYmR6GclZT1Zq8jm9NlQweo7lZlLUr3HzpT4fExnyL0x5c+LyHIOBicW41/yt8oHYYw5Zjjener55MQ+3sRSXvc4T0sNuL68rwU7PpX1FM+1d2WJvIweVmBDxg6X4/JNq/ylK/fw78MsVWqThdKN+RrtdX1wb
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A+AABc6XVg/49dJa1aGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAYIABAEBAQsBgVJRB3daNjEChEGDSAOFOYhmA5k8gS6BJQNUBAcBAQEKAwEBHQsKAgQBAYRQAoFyAiU2Bw4CAwEBDAEBBQEBAQIBBgRxE4VQDYZEAQEBAwEBASEdAQEsCwEECwIBCBgqAgInCyUCBA4FDoJjAYJVAw4hAQ6hXwKKH3mBMoEBggQBAQaCTIJKGIIMBwMGgTkBgVKBJIpbJxyBSUKBOhyCXz6BBIFcAQECAYR0NYIrgzJRAhRHIFQOnmadBgqDC4Ehg2SCcYFxkxwEH6R4j3uRCJNAAYQBAgICAgQFAg4BAQaBWwopgVlwFTsqAYI+PhIXAg6OHxeDWYUUhUVzAgEKKwIGAQkBAQMJfIwSAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,220,1613433600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="874744859"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Apr 2021 19:00:19 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.18]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13DJ0J2R016833 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:19 GMT
Received: from xfe-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.121) by xbe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:00:19 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xfe-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:00:19 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:00:19 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PtL7kGZZ9BGlRWi7/5z/1v46IN6AVn8V7K1ta/0WC3x/B69zNTzSjgufuuJGTF2q2tM5aIV5srzmts62dUYUM7/SFZJ0vnPMIDpz9Wl40t1sXGSDDJmLuaIFx7cd19lLhThxltfArn13eOgMovGgQLQwa/e4LhoemBaK8iJx/mmD0a8fBglozEuTSbV+lRVNi9qfVrzSWS4UYkLtVoHizFcqoIR57ocpo0wMobwP+b9RLOyghXLK+1U1i2o+4GsK2RAB5y55iYv7nTPu9PffCdHlrvNrSovOWlWI1kJGtARcDeTUaQG//aXqhOd53bakLpG9NDLqh3IKepZ85FmhcQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Dnilp0Oks+56CySm63qR42B+1vbuW5RCdaAFbBWoyGw=; b=AsSqzzJvu7Tc0fwjzljkgx6DJuz22HOXws7ZsAXOAIZpYQxErjLe/kYtZFuWcjs9R9hZTs6zrhPARiZsR6+XED/Nxd5oBE1XT4GJQtDhq1nNEVoTHGPkHhjAs9Qo13jVJozaeL0IX7jca54nF4M0s1FqUL3DeKeRIewFJzBp/fPXlvibFKsJZAzAPSlEM8waNfI2tKQ46ezfjrOTI3OzXoSZ9k8YFqZ4J2J85gTnNlaj8lURbwYwwc2TwWQ+ib2U2vGSc2ek2b+PKhhs9YpMKcST4f4ZpKzpzqCQy+tB9u3aZoUbvfL6HpRxCDDc6uLjFvWlQugDQkN6tot32xZJ7Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Dnilp0Oks+56CySm63qR42B+1vbuW5RCdaAFbBWoyGw=; b=afXqa6pDqmHuZ2JNP9kV5ZenKoDuYMirXZU+0Qg29hueOvLfW/bYsrPR/Je1LiLOaa7Ueqg9WJPlzxjNmmBlzFp2yl3994nfI5mhU73XE2sP5E9rye56VzNdddLcecyH48T+Zez7HNKPpLfeKTXJ1CIwtUZN3Cv2409i9nqypt4=
Received: from DM4PR11MB5247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:38a::20) by DM6PR11MB2795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:bf::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.22; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:17 +0000
Received: from DM4PR11MB5247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::21c6:ed7f:6f71:7467]) by DM4PR11MB5247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::21c6:ed7f:6f71:7467%5]) with mapi id 15.20.4020.022; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:17 +0000
From: "Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear@cisco.com>
To: Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@nightwatchcybersecurity.com>
CC: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
Thread-Index: AQHXMJUZ2VQz3qEwN06K4IQYXw3trqqyzU+A
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:17 +0000
Message-ID: <C7B5DB45-F0A1-491C-AD4E-91F67C8C182E@cisco.com>
References: <CAAyEnSMBdXCA0EvgR79P_1gi15pAPfeyu_HgGqgMjWxRP8sxKg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAyEnSMBdXCA0EvgR79P_1gi15pAPfeyu_HgGqgMjWxRP8sxKg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
authentication-results: nightwatchcybersecurity.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nightwatchcybersecurity.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:702d:65b9:d143:ee8c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7fda59f4-ac9c-4b03-43ef-08d8feae60f4
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB2795:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB27953A21CB429831D92FDA83BF4F9@DM6PR11MB2795.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM4PR11MB5247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(99936003)(33656002)(66556008)(8936002)(53546011)(91956017)(6512007)(64756008)(66616009)(316002)(54906003)(122000001)(8676002)(6486002)(36756003)(66476007)(66446008)(478600001)(38100700002)(2906002)(83380400001)(186003)(6916009)(66574015)(5660300002)(71200400001)(966005)(66946007)(6506007)(76116006)(86362001)(4326008)(2616005)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C995284B-D681-44E5-89C6-CC0E32BFEFCF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM4PR11MB5247.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7fda59f4-ac9c-4b03-43ef-08d8feae60f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Apr 2021 19:00:17.6807 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: UCHWbQpyJQMGNW8Uzz1DV+OL1JrOWMj4LJRDgiAVe88S7zB931m/3UqthZtjDuCE
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB2795
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.18, xbe-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/1Lc2W3Y2N-fnEzquhzmwWkUQvdk>
Subject: Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:33 -0000
The question is whether you need something that is easy to parse or something that is human readable and can be localized. It SEEMs that this draft is intended to be human readable, and so 5322 doesn’t seem out of bounds. > On 13 Apr 2021, at 20:43, Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@nightwatchcybersecurity.com> wrote: > > Is there a preference for Internet drafts/RFCs regarding the specific > data/time format to be used? > > Right now we are referencing RFC 5322, but there has been feedback > from multiple people that the ISO 8601 format is easier to parse. This > is in regards to the section 3.5.5 of "draft-foudil-securitytxt-11" > that I am working on: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-foudil-securitytxt-11#section-3.5.4 > > The options I am asking about are the following: > - RFC 3339 (a profile of ISO 8601) > Example: 2021-04-13T06:50:53-07:00 > > - RFC 5322, section 3.3 > Example: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 06:50:53 -0700 > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list > saag@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
- [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Eliot Lear (elear)
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Tim Bray
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… John C Klensin
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Randy Bush
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Ned Freed
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Michael Douglass
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Dave Crocker
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Alan DeKok
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Tony Finch
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… heather flanagan
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… tom petch
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Steve Allen
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… heather flanagan
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Henry Story
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Peter Gutmann
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Tony Finch
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Steve Allen
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Mark Baushke (ietf)
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Metapolymath Majordomo
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Yakov Shafranovich