Re: [saag] AD review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-06

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Thu, 03 September 2015 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583D91ACE8D for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMLflInNNesi for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE7F1A8987 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id B448A284B6C; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:12:36 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150903211236.GV9021@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <55A938F1.9090404@cs.tcd.ie> <20150720044849.GY28047@mournblade.imrryr.org> <B866063D-C1A8-4286-83E1-9EBAE7994297@vigilsec.com> <55E83554.6010808@cisco.com> <62CBD9E2-2DB4-4D3D-93E5-ADEB0F3D3C12@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <62CBD9E2-2DB4-4D3D-93E5-ADEB0F3D3C12@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/4iWBD9QYf4EqK_aKLiy7gwi5BK4>
Subject: Re: [saag] AD review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-06
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: saag@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 21:12:38 -0000

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 04:30:44PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:

>    Institutions, being large or dominant users within a large user base,
>    can assist by coordinating the demise of an algorithm suite, making
>    the transition easier for their own users as well as others.

Nit: I still find the "Institutions, being large ..." phrasing a
bit clumsy.  How about:

    Organizations that are dominant in the market or support a
    large fraction of the user base, can help to overcome inertia
    and hasten the deprecation of a weakened algorithm suite,
    thereby making the transition easier for their own users as
    well as others.

-- 
	Viktor.