[saag] Re: [rfc-i] RFCs vs Standards

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 10 December 2024 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B4FC1D4CF8 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sO2IaTxRjnoh for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD46C1D5C59 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7fd51285746so1890158a12.3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1733874165; x=1734478965; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=a9ebPUV7rr3seOOJGi4pc0gix9SZuXxAb1Bw7YGxaYQ=; b=bxoMpM66VvUfcu0ThmT0Ma8DN1wIyz8mXwvvfxXf9CbS+JaOOFgRuaHmrL+O2pcKLV vZUWrOeofD/2uMaC8iz1KBP8X8LltASumCNABbXjzjR7gCidAg5ZANSk33DE0Mys67pI mHNuMSPrJcE4ynUTLEMcFAyoqQSyUCd5ExMZU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733874165; x=1734478965; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=a9ebPUV7rr3seOOJGi4pc0gix9SZuXxAb1Bw7YGxaYQ=; b=WJDyRRypxCQ39G++IOme6gQTWgrY7CbONkKynVazsa7X5Dx1kxpmNDbsMx2eU9tcXH VOIwpMR7dov8PpjOX1srJE0Zb0Nzl1EoV+sFC4kvtNhAhCRnukb077yixnCDFkUkFfk/ w8Q4Y1JN8M0KElVkoWI7/erNScWwUZW+8wz81nOOnJY6XLssoxyoV3ZNIXuKY15ikT47 b1EyG0tdAypkhlle+gfL7/fi2EjEFO8N4464jT8XIdYaOm0fO54ke3Hk5Ps2YbI9hsSN LbNiBa+2Vm8X1K1qBYd6FduyJoAjhSr4/+VNIFnMfWljbvJ2vIEFd2OyH8B3BpmtMnwq WOTg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV/ixb5vADjBNB2mHA8GGfBDrJDQ8gm4QFNd1qPyI208UDrA1q//jAEpV+3x5oAcStTJjZI@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyTpIoWN1nzHAccfnSAi4hRtbl4DljhRSZtmOfIcPvi9VVL5idy 9GIlaBdV+TvvSRRzaebtvdjk7jNYRTndUHaAqy5mKiyi/k7xq+4l/WtCBwKM5sYwVFL5OHblJ5F PPbec+wXcaPuXDGb5vSDf2/vJpy+szVbSg37uCg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvNWbLc0Hjfg8a+ViV/iw1bNjRkQ24dlEVv6eNdkvrU3y/Y29CqiTXZatIUIDY E6DFkN7mjgDs3YIaZgeKps2OCsdIa8z4xmPLO4OhKQFu9s5PLa4k4pV0JM7Se/Q8Lb/8o
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGDZykZpS8pwyA04NFxxog+ezhbm5ULN6FY+vXpEVSOBht2x/p0xzFBpUenU4Wvq4Nqui047It9hZoF7hyzES0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1b47:b0:2ee:5bc9:75b5 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f127f8debbmr1262663a91.4.1733874165211; Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BE95E617-C929-43BA-BB40-41E189A8158B@akamai.com> <SY8P300MB0711C796AB6095C788556516EE292@SY8P300MB0711.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <15450.1732763286@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <3029EB03-6E7A-47CB-9682-F511CB51EE17@akamai.com> <10065.1732826193@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CACsn0cmWVeFdJ3dzMj5SV4XpJF4rssULtfQ1moeefoq-Evhk=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGL5yWb=tLvMOYFKT3ffVbcy7BAD=i4B0VHEUdkvwRvZ3X3Bsw@mail.gmail.com> <m2mshh4v8l.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABcZeBMjxNbBMYU2p3_a8-5VCExgmY-7XLof7die05YOEX-38A@mail.gmail.com> <70419651-6443-4393-9ca1-8a1c98a68db0@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBNtBRxi5zSf9OvUip2AtyVD6Wt9+kQESuUzo-=Kur9+ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <fac981d9-2fe9-4a84-8af1-845acd72af58@cs.tcd.ie> <14124.1733073164@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <d52ee080-814b-46fd-9e0f-41349941eeac@cs.tcd.ie> <GVXPR07MB9678DF2C14EA44B28C3DA372893D2@GVXPR07MB9678.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F304B6BA-6969-4C62-A217-88E76F82CDC2@tzi.org> <C74E3E9D-E892-48B4-87BE-CD634081AA23@akamai.com> <030FD3D1-8BC9-4C92-84EE-9CD18F451E73@tzi.org> <5249aa71-52c2-4f20-b2ae-62eaf75c82b7@lear.ch> <F54D57D6-F1DF-43A5-A437-7CD2AA4B181A@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <F54D57D6-F1DF-43A5-A437-7CD2AA4B181A@akamai.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:42:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isP3cyMHdZ0u3DOS3F+WXuJzXm9fpzJrBZKgpiojb1r7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b3fd720628f30959"
Message-ID-Hash: VRD6UQGVGFZWSO3E7NYUBMMGWJGSHMOE
X-Message-ID-Hash: VRD6UQGVGFZWSO3E7NYUBMMGWJGSHMOE
X-MailFrom: tbray@textuality.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-saag.ietf.org-0; header-match-saag.ietf.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [saag] Re: [rfc-i] RFCs vs Standards
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/A46_q1TOdbF9UNh8lm2qVoqPxcQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:saag-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:saag-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:saag-leave@ietf.org>

I like that maneuver.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024, 3:41 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> And this is where we run into problems, because the moment you change that
> boiler plate, you will devalue the RFC series
>
> I don’t know about that. The general population seems unable to tell the
> difference among the various RFC streams, as well as drafts and not.
>
> But if necessary, one possible fix is this:
>
> It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material **for
> other than IETF purposes** or to cite them other than as "work in
> progress."
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list -- saag@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to saag-leave@ietf.org
>