Re: [saag] New Version Notification for draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker-02.txt
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 04 July 2021 20:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A9D3A1E92
for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id hfgx-qN1xWiN for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B39773A1E90
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 13:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C584838AFD
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:52:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id Cn9Jv_jeXaPM for <saag@ietf.org>;
Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4EF38ADD
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B881A4B6
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:50:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: saag@ietf.org
References: <161402913142.668.8084091230406313422@ietfa.amsl.com>
<2322.1614029367@localhost>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <8807c53a-6329-78b6-a883-374716eae600@sandelman.ca>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 16:50:27 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2322.1614029367@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/H0e8AxUTH2eHYtoFqy8AAyXntXM>
Subject: Re: [saag] New Version Notification for
draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker-02.txt
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:50:39 -0000
Again, I find situations in which some common understanding of attacks would be useful. Is there any further interest in this document? What do you think about Malory-in-the-Middle? Can we come up with a less golf-aware term like "rough"? On 2021-02-22 4:29 p.m., Michael Richardson wrote: > > internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A new version of I-D, draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker-02.txt has > > been successfully submitted by Michael Richardson and posted to the > > IETF repository. > > Html: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker-02.html > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker-02 > > Abstract: > The terms on-path attacker and Man-in-the-Middle Attack have been > used in a variety of ways, sometimes interchangeably, and sometimes > meaning different things. > > This document offers an update on terminology for network attacks. A > consistent set of terminology is important in describing what kinds > of attacks a particular protocol defends against, and which kinds the > protocol does not.
- Re: [saag] New Version Notification for draft-ric… Michael Richardson
- Re: [saag] New Version Notification for draft-ric… Michael Richardson