[saag] SACM report for IETF-110
Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> Thu, 11 March 2021 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <inacio@cert.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E9D3A089A; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:06:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQifGfOJ2keH; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04ED33A097D; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12B16ZKh029292; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:06:35 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 12B16ZKh029292
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1615424795; bh=4TeM5L/YYqPrd3W0tOLKt48KvOifiHMesw6HiOwRx2w=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=UeSOBOhO7cGPo22f1PGryxbRqr7qFuBsT606AuEp9qMm2Ec2V1We01AHoD3QHnRSD 9FwDn18Mz4bGPGZAHecFZH0DBGAE1f+/jBvnPL2ew8RKkunxQ4NdmgB+NlGYrd48je Vj+1t465b56JE0uUPO6JqkoPpvUI/OY4olzwVnpw=
Received: from MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (muriel.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.47]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12B16Gd3044173; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:06:16 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:06:15 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:06:15 -0500
From: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
CC: "<sacm-chairs@ietf.org>" <sacm-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SACM report for IETF-110
Thread-Index: AQHXFhK79nSwPu50f0Ccme/znRl+3w==
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:06:14 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.60496d05.45cb2cf9.161a@cert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.202.65]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan60496d0545cb2cf9161acertorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/KXNoIOKqwYpe8TqRXd-g3BDUX44>
Subject: [saag] SACM report for IETF-110
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 01:06:43 -0000
SACM met on Wednesday morning during the first session. SACM discussed any remaining issues on closing out the CoSWID draft for final release to IESG and resolving all AD comments. [1] The ROLIE configuration draft has not been updated for a considerable bit of time and the working group dropped all efforts related to this draft. SACM discussed the progress and status of the architecture draft and what would be necessary to the progress this draft. [2] Milestones were reviewed and updated. The CoSWID draft should soon be closed out leaving the only remaining milestone item as the Architecture draft. The WG still intends to progress the Architecture draft. Karen and Chris [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/ -- Chris Inacio inacio@cert.org
- [saag] SACM report for IETF-110 Chris Inacio