[saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis?
Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Mon, 28 December 2020 20:21 UTC
Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DF83A0D75 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:21:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWmGpC0CZPaS for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126D53A0D73 for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id j140so6109311vsd.4 for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:21:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0mvsSzn9Kwh7DiSusfnllxog0IbRbGcHrHcu0+QyQM0=; b=F1ORzvDJnCM7teocZ8OatgvlWlwVRgy88DTfc2CUiXviq/3qJGfLRcQ65Px/wY91L1 +fDBEO1SmFXvC1Mc663pOO5cazRlEb72GNVq6bkQ0WgRQr+MdcR3qNG7veFj7WolNRXB iXQxAQDwgluFcwPxuZnA0jEOs87DwHpUPgElmpWjMyBtc44qVMFWT5T/BF17fDSBC0nA FxIXTSoWWqQnBzNR+0XhTDqO+hsma1PJxZyhPHKtlKeiYkaVzTq5miyX4IqqgBPPVDpG oPhbftD2Xxq6NqWhVzSGzcR0LWy/j7iCcj+JyrjtCV+umcLILYesQz8jIMEcQJdqFUnl 3Ilw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0mvsSzn9Kwh7DiSusfnllxog0IbRbGcHrHcu0+QyQM0=; b=DOpWo9SHcgQzx0BlQxAGCtK7DACcm1HBxzRDfB3wMAOrXkO0XwEpKDe2Ugt2OONF61 Kprm2ZDAz6+rLFGlEHnG3tmxpmiiRRRtFG9tz1+sTHDxGTwQTuKTE0T6vAO5hu2oaRra ao4Q9HHaxDkQFYLnhes8sfhkWuAMGjJmUURJQF5A/MfyQjVDOgIUuK5FNQCn7mMOZT7a ldvkY7dHR43h3fYodr9CnDP6YLG2keS8HIzaTVurFbq9254oTJt3QuQC2nHkj3SwgOBW xmdEW1PfNtbtnGcHP6HCEPf2Mq4rpBtHLSQQ0nr6gQDBZXhnRQF6Yb9MyJg1vawM2UVJ PwdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533z2wTCuz9QsEHbZ5T0WWe/d4ZgtbTmjW2R9LNWf2WWdOtj2/n6 LeUK2ihW+B/yeolC0Z84jmdvJZitMBFiLRRaIcLrgwkDK9s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz99B+N83rqlE9ySweIxn5syEYu+B2YwbzagtuvmuRLxNqPyRsXVhBjK+EyGYITMyo6wcAHCUCMyDuto/QtsAk=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:1142:: with SMTP id 63mr26823479vsr.24.1609186893711; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:21:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:21:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN40gSub=7hbvg6rJueRzkoHy6ejQ+An9ioeWbUmzB0FmfZUKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: saag@ietf.org, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002d4f2f05b78c0570"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/KxSPG3xv5Y543ElJ8WfIs_HlqfI>
Subject: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis?
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 20:21:36 -0000
Hi, The Internet Glossary is a very useful resource to many authors and many SDOs. But it was published in August 2007, several eras of technology in the past. Since the definitions are often out-of-date in their references to source SDO definitions, they are sometimes inaccurate for current usage. Just wondering. Cheers, - Ira
- [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis? Ira McDonald
- Re: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis? Michael Richardson
- Re: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis? Metapolymath Majordomo
- Re: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis? Metapolymath Majordomo