Re: [saag] AD review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-06

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 03 September 2015 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BCB1B4966 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 07:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pT81pXsuli23 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4EC1B4957 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 07:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1371; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1441292225; x=1442501825; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=Obe+iVSeW4edTm54f9Szh3YZ1F1YUqQPmP/8qw1QPxI=; b=G2HZS+CIiYMt/Y2M6J8k06YVTomMoZ4c+sKL7X5+SYw4cbmtQOfHKUrP iW2kBbST1WvWSFcSPeq0ByTdELIRBDZcIF/xarCeTw16nq4NdZQ7zwA9Y osb61vS2u/qEaMqgWuk48SbdHCG7Foi/HjBaWuAOs3zvmhD/TXkdUfRUG M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CqBACoXuhV/xbLJq1dh3y6OodyAoFyEwEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEI1URCxgJFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTCAEBiCq2eZRSAQEBBwIgi26FEheCUoFDAQSSMoMfgkGBXIhaiHiRdyaCEByBVjyJfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,462,1437436800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="629492945"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2015 14:57:03 +0000
Received: from [10.61.222.22] ([10.61.222.22]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t83Ev3aS018976 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:57:03 GMT
To: saag@ietf.org
References: <20150824212907.GN9021@mournblade.imrryr.org> <619ffebb05ba4e2a9af03a6dcc768d6e@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20150824215037.GO9021@mournblade.imrryr.org> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4AE62A1@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <20150825134333.GX9021@mournblade.imrryr.org> <6b5167f3d0684a8a91caa6d37dec65e3@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com> <20150825160627.GH9021@mournblade.imrryr.org> <55DC961A.903@cs.tcd.ie> <20150825165539.GL9021@mournblade.imrryr.org> <55DDA7E4.1090807@cisco.com> <20150826135043.GU9021@mournblade.imrryr.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <55E85FBE.7030609@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:57:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150826135043.GU9021@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cqMhxF5l5h1xFUh8G4XXvbfPcOkv3GB4E"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/N8Quyv3YfnVF2LEVQeBsj7JGAMA>
Subject: Re: [saag] AD review of draft-iab-crypto-alg-agility-06
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:57:07 -0000

Hi Victor,

Sorry for the delay.

On 8/26/15 3:50 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Are there many servers out there with 512-bit DH keys not only for
> export ciphers but across the board?

It's clearly not present on most servers, but it is out there.  I expect
a cleanup has been going on because I'm seeing less bounces this week
than I did in previous weeks.  And it's old code.  The new stuff seems
to do just fine.

Eliot