[saag] DOTS report

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Wed, 22 July 2015 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE0D1B2F36 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.665
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wwPGXGiYpKLh for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1F61B2F1F for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.163.232] (dhcp-a3e8.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.163.232]) by lvps5-35-241-16.dedicated.hosteurope.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E44D6385C; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=tKs9tnAF3pGfbAHmMx3BPKq9Lj4iHSJzcesp2Wk8W2QogmO+WuX4CrTVifqYR43CtIGFzIfCthCll8Hw/F0qMcuB068FZz6G2c73QWltVDbSPc3IgIV9Syd6jbLjfGkuGg9NYwnzZoJFSkxjBYXTiNcxnwFUQRHV80AXZcZz7Ss=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
Message-ID: <55B01643.8020206@gondrom.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:16:35 +0200
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: saag@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/R4a1HLKj_0PK7SroJIp_NDCen9s>
Subject: [saag] DOTS report
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:16:39 -0000

Hi all,

DOTS met on Tuesday evening for our first meeting as a newly chartered 
WG. The meeting duration was only one hour and we had to cut short some 
of the discussion topics. The meeting primarily focused on exploring use 
cases and requirements proposed in a number of individual drafts and 
mailing list conversation. The working group had an active and good 
discussion on the use cases, requirements and the next steps forward. 
And there have been a significant number of companies interested in 
implementing the WG's outcome.

In reviewing the list of use cases and presented requirements, the 
consensus of the working group was to:

** Consolidate the individual use case drafts and mailing list feedback 
into a single WG use cases draft
** Consolidate the requirements drafts and feedback into a single WG 
requirements draft


The chairs plan to arrange an interim meeting to further accelerate 
progress.

Best regards,
Roman and Tobias