Re: [saag] The Mathematical Mesh

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 25 April 2019 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C701120260; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uehRfrH6QkE2; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ostrich.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (ostrich.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6717612025C; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D6C5C5B28; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.28.64]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 952935C5AD2; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:42:38 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Arithmetic-Stop: 4dfcbe24222139ea_1556228558719_4189485943
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1556228558718:3285635047
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1556228558718
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E80825D6; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=V4YaBM4/+cFl7+ uSG86P/Zz2RP0=; b=c30Gq3dra2TBG+tA2aR9jXTo2PIzDt9YFI25XwVe6SoSkE fdvFjK30BnjAe6N6/S1j878clOpLnInrgQvri+mvBtSiI+cHEJDMvl3qUZRcy7zC mvVK+FAwrSH5Unl766EbKBqi9XAyB5yl/NZWjBccb6jyvUMsiU4VVW9YZKQBk=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD610825D8; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:42:34 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a22
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: secdispatch@ietf.org, IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190425214233.GX3137@localhost>
References: <CAMm+LwiF3iGiRO5reW4KCgf8vp=Kv=+4pD+_rGOcxEsD1Hxk4g@mail.gmail.com> <20190425161404.GS3137@localhost> <CAMm+LwgxdhusDWrHDs8SSGbjptPiRYPM30p9H=BFrpCbbRHdPQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgxdhusDWrHDs8SSGbjptPiRYPM30p9H=BFrpCbbRHdPQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrheehgddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/RNjpCmgwMw8hYF2IjFFe8iwupqw>
Subject: Re: [saag] The Mathematical Mesh
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:42:43 -0000

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 05:12:00PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:14 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
> wrote:
> 
> Just to be clear: It is a similar approach to blockchain. The encoding used
> is entirely separate.

Understood.  The point is that you end up with a cryptographic
append-only log.

> The reason I was able to simplify the Mesh code was that I realized that
> all my application protocols could be implemented as instances of
> synchronizing containers between devices.

Nice.

> > Count on me as a reviewer,
> 
> Thanks, that is greatly appreciated. The status of the current drafts is
> that the text is more or less complete, there are some missing images and
> multiple missing examples.

Is that a request for review sooner than later?

> The reason for that is that I alternate between writing the documentation
> and implementing it. I began by writing the documentation, wrote the code,
> went back and wrote new documentation describing the code and so on.

Understood.

Nico
--