IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 17 February 2020 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD9E12088F for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:52:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqoXJt-VkEry for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:52:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43EE91208A6 for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:52:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF86D501A99; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-217-5.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.217.5]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 64F27501A2F; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a47.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.5); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:52:48 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Thread-Keen: 2b0ed5ed48ba9d13_1581958368627_1566966042
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1581958368627:3428046966
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1581958368627
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A4283502; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:52:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Xe7h3DeBy0Gr9ONLkmaY3z9+12Q =; b=EtYcK3BqaN78uvf1LapUKvoKftSWInH76YY/BwkcZTi9XzJIo9lAdW7r8mU MLknnD5adNjFCVUF8CKTJEAIFDBD6RYlZhwH4qrqIjvzZsRw9mqYJKdKkERWznY1 M2n1vZqpHN8w1OfMaxvPtWbxdUYAdcTksi4LE1ekUJNxmc8U=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7519283507; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:52:41 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a47
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200217165239.GD18021@localhost>
References: <ac360994-e747-6913-fdc3-19b7db2e00c3@netmagic.com> <3854.1581431519@dooku> <20200213174617.GQ18021@localhost> <18044.1581688781@dooku> <20200214203306.GW18021@localhost> <3586.1581771453@dooku> <20200215184827.GB18021@localhost> <3459.1581938558@dooku> <20200217155412.GC18021@localhost> <20200217160522.GN49778@straasha.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200217160522.GN49778@straasha.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjeeigdelhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/SynUR9itwY9lbjhrVhX_952lNrk>
Subject: Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:52:53 -0000

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:05:22AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:54:13AM -0600, Nico Williams wrote:
> > DNS/DNSSEC almost by definition cannot provide a solution for
> > smaller-than-universal namespaces,
> 
> That's may not be exactly the case (haven't read most of the thread, so
> perhaps missed something important posted before).
> 
> Your last hop (or stub) resolver can be configured with whatever
> trust-anchors you want for suitable private branches of the namespace.
> 
> So if ".local" is your thing, then feel free to set a local trust-anchor
> for ".local" and publish TLSA, ... there.

That's why I put in that weasel word, "almost", in the above.  I had
that sort of thing in mind, among others, but I didn't want to
immediately jump into them, though I'm glad you brought it up!

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email