Re: [saag] NIST requests comments on using ISO/IEC 19790:2012 as the U.S. Federal Standard for cryptographic modules

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 18 August 2015 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63691A8839 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jjcneQ0xWpO3 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280DF1A882F for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04D6BE75; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:28:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEYg_CJHKcvx; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:28:19 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72A1ABE5D; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:28:19 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1439908099; bh=ahDv3KN0U7hZ8kGu5l1u4XK693WMvB+jh3fHIpZGnio=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=19QpAMqUIL9T0c68uMLeWu1Ygs0pSFlZvFZC74PPT71kE+Vb1I3+y25qk+sQrGbqQ VJFoOIBqWXzHfJrX1T6CkYnDKj5l/b4hNMYcxH9TWDIn4J5JRugJcSxG6arI9txBGW WRYlmy2CnZgeexyaxMAysDTcrD31OxLIGJKhTzbE=
Message-ID: <55D34103.9010607@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:28:19 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <55CE5A40.3090804@cs.tcd.ie> <CAPofZaGT__FmChCWNf=iMsyD4s7c1SpUus2Lm_6ubhA3ayfGqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG-id0ZYG946xZQrsfrMqyQunLpg=ZeGGP8BcQRVtFE0s7b3DQ@mail.gmail.com> <55CF35B2.9020302@cs.tcd.ie> <CACz1E9rg8ZtHLCpZ8utBF67PTOiDKWTDGvepqL0SXL_0WR0=+g@mail.gmail.com> <F2C87ED1-E00B-4B46-AF01-33FF4FD0A237@vigilsec.com> <CAL02cgQjM=gStDy-O1a4GXBFh=2Zur4br4Ea17XKW3_fEru1MA@mail.gmail.com> <75EDF4F6-A8E9-4423-ACD2-31671413EFBD@vigilsec.com> <55D26385.8050203@cs.tcd.ie> <11010.1439907188@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <11010.1439907188@sandelman.ca>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6a3W9IsGgor3MdLaUxkgICf1qeGqDLBam"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/T7bpKMS0yJIF2ZyVXI-v8n_5tm0>
Cc: IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [saag] NIST requests comments on using ISO/IEC 19790:2012 as the U.S. Federal Standard for cryptographic modules
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:28:23 -0000


On 18/08/15 15:13, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:
>     > On 17/08/15 23:31, Russ Housley wrote:
>     >> I think it would be stronger if these comments went to NIST from the
>     >> IETF Security Area Directors or the IESG.
> 
>     > Fair enough, I'm happy to chat with Kathleen and see how
>     > best to process a statement if you or someone has time to
>     > draft a bit of text. Or if nobody does I'll try get to it
>     > next week if Kathleen doesn't beat me to it. (I at least
>     > may need reminding - so please bug me if nothing appears
>     > to happen a lot;-)
> 
>     > I don't think it'd be right for the IESG to send but I'm
>     > happy to chat with the IESG and IAB to find a way to get
>     > the message sent. (*)
> 
> I think it's directly related to OpenStand.

Fair point.

S.


> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
>