Re: [saag] Feedback on Salted EAP draft

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Tue, 14 July 2015 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5521ACDCA; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B5dz_UOxV92C; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1481A90B4; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.96.17) by DM2PR0301MB0654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.96.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.207.19; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:33 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.96.17]) by DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.96.17]) with mapi id 15.01.0207.004; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:33 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [saag] Feedback on Salted EAP draft
Thread-Index: AQHQaLHrVAFSGso38EO3YVUruJIky50wlJIAgAAClVuAqzPugIAAFhaQ
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:33 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR0301MB06558BFBD0251595A3B4B0B9A89B0@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHbuEH5u=Q_h4L4yNdrpPw1J3fAsr1MfEMBV84TgdnHVWcxX0w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH4--TP0duM-8GSaR4RaUG5DoL=QtnCFE3shHbaUNPvwVg@mail.gmail.com> <tsloane9wff.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHbuEH5cGW3pknnwseEnp=mqzrMLPFBh-bN4pd2wKKDgpS08wQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH5cGW3pknnwseEnp=mqzrMLPFBh-bN4pd2wKKDgpS08wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ed31::3]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR0301MB0654; 5:ER4GRMSswEfHg1XZ8s8M1t/n1jnRYjZ9UJHbZhbvn9noym/6S3TDQ2Ztpx6Mb6GUmESFuwFu2N4Pq6Q1aHk1uQ3JdEZqTnYEfmZGA2wwZ36IRNE1/7f1KY8qbtsMOtgPofXTZHnBtO6oBca6SpV+vQ==; 24:GjIcB/kVhrI7mmq+qC0NxXzVQedqdj0+Em4TUGW3tRLoCtCHIFh7O7JRLNmHLZU0pHn4Y5d6sKFyvYB4Mt14meaTNmqhFr14xlRQ9RiUlMI=; 20:5eN1JXlfjDsfsFNgujU41B751ZXiPPJ1nWmKPIw0Ze75eFIT5BqgwGC0k8F3Ta+iFbsIs9bNFiuzbwnttHqDcw==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR0301MB065454C201F88270EA0457A5A89B0@DM2PR0301MB0654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654;
x-forefront-prvs: 0637FCE711
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(377454003)(106116001)(93886004)(77096005)(5003600100002)(86362001)(50986999)(2656002)(54356999)(76176999)(2171001)(99286002)(40100003)(5001770100001)(551544002)(62966003)(92566002)(2900100001)(76576001)(5001960100002)(86612001)(33656002)(74316001)(87936001)(2950100001)(5002640100001)(189998001)(102836002)(46102003)(77156002)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654; H:DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Jul 2015 17:50:33.1176 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0301MB0654
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/UrnWnWB6FYHpn6Afb3fNLZhEk3U>
Cc: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [saag] Feedback on Salted EAP draft
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:36 -0000

On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:01 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:

> Is there interest in reviewing this draft?  Sam pointed out the importance of moving 
> this work forward, it would be helpful to have volunteers to review the work and also 
> to understand the level of interest (if any) before this goes forward as AD sponsored.

The draft is short and clear enough, but it acknowledges a pretty big security issue: "the salted 
password from a compromised database can be used directly to impersonate the client-- there 
is no dictionary attack needed to recover the plaintext password."

That's a pretty big caveat, but there are still some advantages over operating with unsalted passwords. The draft aligns server side password management for EAP-pwd  with standard industry practices, which is good. In case of server compromise, the immediate effect of the compromise is an attack on the already compromised server, and the per-user salt make password discovery harder. The security section should be expanded to explain this tradeoff.

Nits:

- in the abstract, missing "not" in " but did (not?) include support for salted passwords."

-- Christian Huitema