IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)

"Santosh Chokhani" <SChokhani@cygnacom.com> Fri, 03 April 2009 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <SChokhani@cygnacom.com>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAE93A67EC for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UY07ERRyKwf6 for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com (scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com [65.242.48.253]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EB9C83A6939 for <saag@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9655 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 18:10:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scygexch1.cygnacom.com) (10.60.50.8) by scygmxsecs1.cygnacom.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 18:10:21 -0000
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:11:27 -0400
Message-ID: <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D48A9FFAF@scygexch1.cygnacom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090403173655.GK1500@Sun.COM>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)
Thread-Index: Acm0hzod+EbnZW7mT5uHCv4OgEisjAAAD3Tw
References: <20090402154402.GM1500@Sun.COM> <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D48A9FF82@scygexch1.cygnacom.com> <20090403154253.GZ1500@Sun.COM> <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D48A9FF9E@scygexch1.cygnacom.com> <20090403173655.GK1500@Sun.COM>
From: Santosh Chokhani <SChokhani@cygnacom.com>
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Cc: labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, saag@ietf.org, nfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:10:27 -0000

I do not know what the ISO spec has in it and how it relates to SPIF
work we did. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Williams [mailto:Nicolas.Williams@sun.com] 
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 1:37 PM
> To: Santosh Chokhani
> Cc: saag@ietf.org; labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org; 
> nfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; nfsv4@ietf.org; selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
> Subject: Re: [saag] Common labeled security (comment on 
> CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)
> 
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:34:23PM -0400, Santosh Chokhani wrote:
> > The work I am mentioning was done for NSA and can be 
> released if NSA 
> > is ok with it.
> > 
> > I suspect NSA will be ok with it. 
> 
> Great!
> 
> But I was referring to the ISO15816 spec -- that does not 
> belong to the NSA, though the NSA might be able to pull 
> strings to make it a free spec.  It took so long to make the 
> ASN.1 specs free that I wouldn't hold my breath.  I may be 
> better for the IETF to start over on a replacement for SPIF.
> 
> Nico
> -- 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email