Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit-08.txt> (Proof of Transit) to Experimental RFC
Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Mon, 20 September 2021 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1693A1071
for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Y4MZtSG7GUpi for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx36-out20.antispamcloud.com (mx36-out20.antispamcloud.com
[209.126.121.68])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A5C3A10BD
for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xse.mail2web.com ([66.113.192.6])
by mx134.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1mSO1H-0009T8-Hf
for saag@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:28:01 +0200
Received: from xsmtp22.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.61])
by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HCtMz1GGnzDS2
for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.15] (helo=xmail05.myhosting.com)
by xsmtp22.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
(Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1mSO1H-0000Cp-0S
for saag@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:27:59 -0700
Received: (qmail 28046 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2021 18:27:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.103])
(Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.43.0])
(envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>)
by xmail05.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA
for <saag@ietf.org>; 20 Sep 2021 18:27:56 -0000
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, saag@ietf.org
References: <163163996293.20766.13128213938136732159@ietfa.amsl.com>
<20210915034058.GW32645@kduck.mit.edu>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <fecef9aa-6d4f-bba6-d9be-b5a50c3a7361@huitema.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:27:56 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210915034058.GW32645@kduck.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.192.6
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.192.0/27
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass
smtp.auth=66.113.192.0/27@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: ham
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.04)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT/YziCy6jr9lKzvJ68cXCOdPUtbdvnXkggZ
3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5yWiPbS8Ro+eA58J1YtqZ1vKj/EwzSHE5FGYwwjsNRPCJ7d
yRAS12o9A5gRGBY4hw3mD6wdmZPcItWbGe10hXJtXL4FsauCVkDjmcYJdU3yWp7KuHNaaKdg7iBE
ZefdsNUFWKwa/wzJUjmazeC7ImcaqlHdH9stIYSUOP2ajLGtTxQ6V51u76v35b1wNe/MvdIN+Yj9
JT+HIE3AciYbXmyy2+J9PgaoF8SQHto3le4zsAApCVB1N/BtJyJqv7YkIyyKggeTQ85o+W6+jEZD
z+LhiyQEs+dlGXUJLWZ+Gc08Nmllke3azHdKmySKNUVQl4ntlVxnbS8qIO7oudHyb2T1t0DNtlpu
9/j54C+9KfQPluPQHHIQ/hjX8s5UcsOm8JZqy4TFaO7Oawv4tcQOp8LxvCrJPmnnTHzVkpybMK7Z
Te2KiOojQ29oDb9/XiQyH3UVmM65ILKePxcrIG9nD1eCC/9N3HswhrQ+2bGrjQGyzqsQ8ZpR+9NA
PyZNieblXJv94Hfpe9sG4LVTWytPhXFwGplHcpVCCoX989hgB8R+yAQDZvsWpz1i3RJfF18v/Hn2
IdgNIvlD03l2pWai/9f0WFEpAJcQj0HgJhKdXdhlBvJ5ihK/fUNrpvspygsrZm6Z/ymK4h3WSUbI
RN1rX+zGHhXMkO1SRMQu0OHkc1g9J9M+m4WpRRDP6YzwkAPgQJbHgUKU7gPf/Ym4oY5Lab+v4Hde
MsQ5iNYUlyF1rM6ES49fY8vtGEBoIl4faQj/ZxrE8QQUrbo0bzvIY1SDFdZjhF7t+QV4JHEZ4TGv
vxgxztU2UhtzRpg3gHgKMcINocT1H/aAwarQpYDOYx/6JtUOT+sjd/HcgBdtZgNzSo/Jnj8LsjKG
jaMRfhQwBM0F5SQapWlNs7cS3i0hHSVKIoCaIRFsicyJMEhQFtD8PLoinr2BOFGTfVNGB/Vv6kR/
SBDEWOLWOsZBpei09LsubRJ9jrN323GKrqmxgBKAv+BRRw==
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine11.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/WVORm5DRxLvWzhEk18QKhp5Os7g>
Subject: Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit-08.txt>
(Proof of Transit) to Experimental RFC
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:28:09 -0000
On 9/14/2021 8:40 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > The proof-of-transit techniques in this document might be interesting to > readers here. Or not. The proposed algorithm is broken. -- Christian Huitema > > -Ben > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:19:23AM -0700, The IESG wrote: >> The IESG has received a request from the Service Function Chaining WG (sfc) >> to consider the following document: - 'Proof of Transit' >> <draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit-08.txt> as Experimental RFC >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final >> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2021-09-28. Exceptionally, comments may >> be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning >> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> Several technologies such as Traffic Engineering (TE), Service >> Function Chaining (SFC), and policy based routing are used to steer >> traffic through a specific, user-defined path. This document defines >> mechanisms to securely prove that traffic transited a defined path. >> These mechanisms allow to securely verify whether, within a given >> path, all packets traversed all the nodes that they are supposed to >> visit. This document specifies a data model to enable these >> mechanisms using YANG. >> >> >> >> >> The file can be obtained via >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit/ >> >> >> The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2937/ >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3751/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IETF-Announce mailing list >> IETF-Announce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list > saag@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
- [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-t… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sfc-proof-… Christian Huitema