Re: [saag] SHA-1 to SHA-n transition

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Tue, 03 March 2009 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3261D3A69BB for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:22:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.429, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwPK8kXCHNDh for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.auckland.ac.nz (moe.its.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.12.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A70728C2B3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A52B481D64; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:22:46 +1300 (NZDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhost.auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mailhost.auckland.ac.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (moe.its.auckland.ac.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzF8MwDJR9yT; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:22:46 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from iris.cs.auckland.ac.nz (iris.cs.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.33.152]) by mailhost.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D944F481D5E; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:22:45 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz (wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.34.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by iris.cs.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C52D1DE4001; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:22:45 +1300 (NZDT)
Received: from pgut001 by wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <pgut001@wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz>) id 1LeaCT-0001WI-2K; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:22:45 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: ekr@networkresonance.com, jhutz@cmu.edu, pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
In-Reply-To: <630A197A21A391B6C148B3D7@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
Message-Id: <E1LeaCT-0001WI-2K@wintermute01.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Sender: pgut001 <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:22:45 +1300
Cc: mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG, Nicolas.Williams@sun.com, saag@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [saag] SHA-1 to SHA-n transition
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:22:21 -0000

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> writes:

>Unfortunately, it also creates a fairly signficant set of problems, in that
>the credentials are no longer portable -- besides needing to know your
>password, you need a salt that's hidden somewhere in your browser's long-term
>state.

Yes, I know, and I also knew that every time anyone mentions something like
this someone immediately raises the point you've just made, which is why I
addressed it in my original message.

Peter.