Re: [saag] saag - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 111
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 12 July 2021 03:07 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574FB3A2A8E
for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id P0U4b4p09hDr for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346D83A2ACF
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 20:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE6338FFB
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 21:10:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 0iWkPWrrIN2k for <saag@ietf.org>;
Sun, 11 Jul 2021 21:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D350138FFE
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 21:10:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338FA48B
for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jul 2021 21:07:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: saag@ietf.org
References: <162526337432.26814.8159027228595869118@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <6dd3e025-0a42-3929-649c-bcef36853a5a@sandelman.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 21:07:11 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <162526337432.26814.8159027228595869118@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/aZ2dk9CHfrZVvAvVuSB-UCNZ6Os>
Subject: Re: [saag] saag - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 111
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 03:07:46 -0000
On 2021-07-02 6:02 p.m., "IETF Secretariat" wrote: > saag Session 1 (2:00 requested) > Tuesday, 27 July 2021, Session II 1430-1530 > Room Name: Room 7 size: 507 Tuesday? Will we even know it's a SAAG meeting? On the other hand, my list of conflicts is few! I would like to have 10 minutes to talk about draft-richardson-saag-onpath-attacker-02 I think that agreeing on some three terms would help us with discussions. I'm completely agnostic about the choice. Maybe we don't even need to publish a document, as long as we can get consensus on the terms and when to use them. Updates RFC4949 would be nice. (RFC4949bis would also be a nice thing to do)
- [saag] saag - Requested session has been schedule… "IETF Secretariat"
- Re: [saag] saag - Requested session has been sche… Michael Richardson