Re: [saag] Liking Linkability

Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> Mon, 22 October 2012 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <danbri@danbri.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757B311E80DE for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhE1BdN4zQI5 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9767911E80A5 for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ro8so2164934pbb.31 for <saag@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=D+hbFKa6JxgF2qEttg6PSP+L0+nAZ340AidPHWTynY4=; b=ftbwUiMtXlFO+S7H0q5v4SXSJoa9ckLKGhfZpKhgCmPlGQYyoCXBoks9MtZJfPi6UO rf+RBHNFUv2AAdp8aqe0lzSPDpfS56ueuJUG1cjv/Jw93Ks5/sqcxMEyx/gjkgtPzchs 25cUVFWqL+UNCDC1AdhNqnRbIyUvcUtC7rwxid1ctt5ErObqctw1hwxsaV/cDsSeHqKt hL40sC//CCKoxQSd3kkxyZlS8HRP8pA56TldrDkHa5S5sZEXijYEfpPzuMFOX6IqXGyq VGxGZB4d9XzUplDA3owcjpMTioQop3hOcSUYec4TJjAwXAKAKx3LXJSluDoFaIvOatm2 GQQA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.213.1 with SMTP id no1mr31774663pbc.123.1350927089229; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.241.226 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.241.226 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <508562C2.1060905@w3.org>
References: <CCA5E789.2083A%Josh.Howlett@ja.net> <tslzk3jsjv8.fsf@mit.edu> <201210181904.PAA07773@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> <FB9E461D-CA62-4806-9599-054DF24C3FD9@bblfish.net> <CAG5KPzxGz+4MywjP4knfbDr2gyvqUZc1HEBXgtaDfYT+DPg5yg@mail.gmail.com> <8AB0C205-87AE-4F76-AA67-BC328E34AF5E@bblfish.net> <CABrd9SQghpi6_rVQKxYXZDtM5HwvE7Kq7SUw5zi41ZRd3y2h9A@mail.gmail.com> <4324B524-7140-49C0-8165-34830DD0F13B@bblfish.net> <CABrd9SQU1uYVaVPedokHxeYkT=759rkPFfimWK1Z8ATzo3yNFA@mail.gmail.com> <5083CCCF.2060407@webr3.org> <50842789.3080301@openlinksw.com> <50845268.4010509@webr3.org> <5084AC77.8030600@openlinksw.com> <50851512.9090803@webr3.org> <CABrd9SRNVLbWxifQAQ6iuX4qMeFmZVD6rO_q=L348G1UZzr9tg@mail.gmail.com> <50852726.9030102@openlinksw.com> <CABrd9SQ3KTqHq1hOfbLAU5hfgNyqCPK4u+ToEda+VtQ5S0utwA@mail.gmail.com> <5085360E.3080008@openlinksw.com> <50853CD8.8020005@w3.org> <5FB468E4-BDD3-4635-ACD0-A23540C08751@bblfish.net> <508562C2.1060905@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:31:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFoOPbdsP-e-zyGfNtp=fC4XZSF1N61ujPDRBxZEZj-Wgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c6ba455e1d04cca9399b
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkEkartrz/qhmCEbDT9DPpwX+RRw8CUMhkO5dMIVWoDjR6NZ8j5I8u3NM5QwYSV1u+9jeY3
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:09:57 -0700
Cc: public-identity@w3.org, saag@ietf.org, "public-privacy, \(W3C mailing list\)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, public-webid@w3.org
Subject: Re: [saag] Liking Linkability
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:31:31 -0000

On 22 Oct 2012 08:14, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/22/2012 04:04 PM, Henry

> I know WebID folks believe IDP = my homepage, but for most people IDP
would likely not be a homepage, but a major identity provider for which
data minimization principles should apply, including ownership of the
social network data of an individual and a history of their interactions
with every RP.

Is there some reason it is implausible to assume homepages will never be
backed by major identity providers? Specifically, user-controlled DNS
names, but resolving to more sophisticated hosting than old-style
homepages....

Dan