IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322

Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE883A1503; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zP7dNc_1bgiX; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62EA63A1504; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id o17so11207698qkl.13; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=v8dbp2CVAiGMM/ZFlxMjv09t8VV5cEVyub4JAjtjE7I=; b=KNM0K+tXUadcz+8GKsa45YXDs45KovhNQG5o2N0lePlApaeIBoiKYPWtzxcGPnWp2w BSJJDF5nn2kHGObZ8xEJcEKkBAjWktacUmJSVuxOdVPG3HkL2iNhy0GBfEZfzt2rFLyK 2HAllKqwPJg20jOuQk6zP6pSekj5SjgOIsibUrWgIghbpf+Wnwv4U8fzhmtusNgdevLA HzOWjns/yJijrojJi8pxhXbio5x/UszPh9taVyqolGVsniONRdE+7zXJT8KW5c9mtkJU iUCr8NykdINSvpQJM7LC+uye7cvWy8bkOWpkLmt605bfysQKZ6/MNZwMMMi9PWda9tEg yLTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=v8dbp2CVAiGMM/ZFlxMjv09t8VV5cEVyub4JAjtjE7I=; b=tJ1B9DTwuJOq8jPJ23jAxG6qCtED4s/sQ+b+z9xeXFsUU2f17Rypgy0Pgo9F2gw13b kmGE1z0+hPkp0P8YHIkyFCIHJ1o77wSkamG0lkphA9rdJCrt5ZIERlSEMfEEcAhUWYP7 9OtpFqCBpVy9jR8g/SEJ6+Uk7Aj7+y+7Pw0EhgXwZq/PQFRFw6Hn2Mhlm06yWqIMB9Ol 7gfkepJVZMcnEzaACjLqMSl9lxBtpmTI8bp7FygEAQon/SuLkw9jMtHMINChFZx1bx6t 03Z1LoMMxaSmt4gWOMxZNgWlLJ0XI97uBagxqKsqyPe1VdgV1+rnUewkB1SMdtSX/5a+ 6uAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318Xjlq1Ei7F7x1leMiThKjCnqrFbERz4jCZEOJNRt+DrfY3vfy 3TiQfFKQE0/M/y6htOV1xJ4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNCE3pljxiohI8tMMNrguWwap3M0a/M/8Y4nwcB2Vi7Gr1ZVl6dWE/p0VCke+yAme1P3bZcg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9087:: with SMTP id s129mr35552514qkd.297.1618355336141; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.149] (cpe-74-70-70-237.nycap.res.rr.com. [74.70.70.237]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 81sm10271830qkl.121.2021.04.13.16.08.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@nightwatchcybersecurity.com>
References: <CAAyEnSMBdXCA0EvgR79P_1gi15pAPfeyu_HgGqgMjWxRP8sxKg@mail.gmail.com> <C7B5DB45-F0A1-491C-AD4E-91F67C8C182E@cisco.com> <20210413191937.GK9612@localhost>
From: Michael Douglass <mikeadouglass@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3ac37291-a75d-53b0-27e4-94875b143c63@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:08:54 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210413191937.GK9612@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/dQR1YbnkrKhfzJtSjapNLsadzd8>
Subject: Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:09:02 -0000

Even as a UK person I prefer the ISO8601 format

On 4/13/21 15:19, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 07:00:17PM +0000, Eliot Lear (elear) wrote:
>> The question is whether you need something that is easy to parse or
>> something that is human readable and can be localized.  It SEEMs that
>> this draft is intended to be human readable, and so 5322 doesn’t seem
>> out of bounds.
> English-centric much?  :)
>
> Seriously, RFC 5322 is unnecessarily English centric, and ISO 8601 is
> universally understandable.
>
> Nico

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email