IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] IETF 93 Agenda Request - Key Discovery

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 24 July 2015 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8971ABB19 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HoHzG5sEQPK for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E581A00B0 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 5EC13282FB0; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:00:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:00:04 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150724050004.GC4347@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <20150721222308.GU28047@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20150721231021.59110.qmail@ary.lan> <CAL02cgQ3aTwpt43YYWSL-pEGcA5v1a10BskuA7-U1YN1Jk+G2w@mail.gmail.com> <20150723130501.GO4347@mournblade.imrryr.org> <D14EE2BF-6AAE-456C-A4C0-9AA96E80937B@oracle.com> <20150723132637.GQ4347@mournblade.imrryr.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1507232336040.22210@multics.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1507232336040.22210@multics.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/dWJkp3mMnEYjiL8UuikjBXb5k_c>
Subject: Re: [saag] IETF 93 Agenda Request - Key Discovery
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: saag@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:00:07 -0000

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:48:30PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

> > Even if some large email providers do end up supporting oauth SASL
> > for various web services, it seems unlikely that they would do so
> > for email accounts, where federated authentication seems rather
> > out of place.  [...]
> 
> I do not think it is a question of "even if" --
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg03528.html is
> one example of Google declaring intent to implement the final version of
> draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth, and explicitly mentions email.

Poorly poorly stated conditionals, I meant to say "even if some
[particular] large provider".  Of course "some", perhaps even most
will.  The intent is to say that support for SASL OATH somewhere,
does not then lead to HTTP code in the receiving MTA.

--
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email