[saag] LAMPS Summary

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 09 November 2021 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D766A3A0C9D for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:26:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GAHIg8FZlRwb for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:26:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3423A0C93 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF51300BF4 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:26:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id oGoC92viWvA8 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:26:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61A61300B25 for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:26:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Message-Id: <18C0BD72-8034-474D-9A55-3D5578E84E8D@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:26:38 -0500
To: IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/dvaepQD5VYjJbz86SNhHrxulrYA>
Subject: [saag] LAMPS Summary
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:26:44 -0000

Three documents are with the RFC Editor or the IESG:
  a)  draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update
  b)  draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms
  c)  draft-ietf-lamps-samples

The CMP-related documents need one more revision, and then they will be ready for WG Last Call:
  a)  draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates
  b)  draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile

The S/MIME-related documents are moving slowly, but during IETF 112, a way forward was selected:
  a)  draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection
  b)  draft-dkg-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance

The assignment for a document-signing extended key usage object identifier is under consideration.  It has strong support and strong opposition too.  A call for adoption will determine whether there is consensus to move forward:
  a)  draft-ito-documentsigning-eku

Clarification is needed to RFC 7030 and the handling of attributes in the certificate signing request (CSR).  During IETF 112, a way forward was selected:
  a)  draft-richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs (Michael)

Documents for using PQC in certificates and CMS are getting started.  The first one failed to meet the cut-off deadline; it is related to NIST PQC KEM public keys in certificates.  Others are looking at the combination of traditional algorithms with PQC algorithms:
  a)  draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-encryption
  b)  draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-keys
  c)  draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-sigs
  d)  draft-ounsworth-pq-explicit-composite-keys