IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Wed, 18 March 2020 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FD73A1700 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=R5GR5NQ8; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Hy1dRWjF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3j8U4FZbg8VW for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B1E53A16FD for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425F35C02A7 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:59:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:59:34 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=lmN2DChNWAkv+kYBBr5yVcHJpLrNPzK AiMn0UoakCn8=; b=R5GR5NQ8kw0B+eBJBTHTxc5bFbORilruXJA4CWBjdrHohix BeGeh1BB8rygC4ZUZq8CAzh106bMFWrmX1fQXVxjFRR+ld7BMg/On5Lrygoq2cWQ earXJkYIj0DLPujBZW6fO6Gk/qZeL5um1FvbikMUzDpfM+uaKC697qtQ2oTQNV17 dD8P5/tz2ClVRtslFlXZdXMqhx8De2FMRoZH1RawXogOZEInN3ZCswaq3xTRSiW1 yzqmOOQoDZSHqfcv0yOUAq6r/VM8uKMhteUXuleWP5n0sEpEIPxCu5ijkIfLyI/N lBBrlzNrl+Yre2s4Rc7YYFyqNv/m3O2Fu/Bs17A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=lmN2DC hNWAkv+kYBBr5yVcHJpLrNPzKAiMn0UoakCn8=; b=Hy1dRWjFgU7X8bknG+RwKf 20SWifd2Y7Stb699eW0jCdMY6vcK3Mj4+a662mlYLlSjTbRb1Oj/JVj1cWVwMu9u kaIMVaWQfSlTbwkKI32pmtWVpmWOgIN+LDu4fXtilUwwNCb3NMr3puxRmO97srSV 1xsqhc/vNaLYXPr0um7vTfiVymHBhKQ04H7tq6N7FdOnGeujfYmOdAtPqeNZkZbt OqVwkQQIYMjVEbNCOzwB4RUoOp2o+OBXVUqLj3B/ejm3Sc5f69EWDlNA4YVwMY0G oLqoEWg1XoS+2qAPkmq556jIrqAmQLlFm4PoM6G8eac2YwXTRq728bgjrFCmQ6zA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VjdyXqboL_WO-IHQjGw7RahhU-n2o5pGCZtqFvdtBXC4LnicponJQQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudefjedgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvrhcuhghoohgufdcuoegtrgif sehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvghtqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VjdyXhVc3IL2ExdS0i5GROt0Wzv1xVuL1J84tZ4fcxuhoMB5AoM0Dw> <xmx:VjdyXuARHQtJUF17Yz3WIaW1OjIqlM1cKa7y0h9oBBDC8LPYRqDibQ> <xmx:VjdyXlJklkyEXeV7Wwf9ztvBXxGSAg5QBM3akSgRJWrrKGz_toq7kw> <xmx:VjdyXgdNFIRLpngCJyryhbeTPCovnAvCeTclRPgnL0ahhQenhtMRDw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E59F63C00A1; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-991-g5a577d3-fmstable-20200305v3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <6b73afd0-6eda-4533-a499-166934702f6e@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F318A864-CC99-47F7-BEFF-608F93AEB451@akamai.com>
References: <7231a98e-e4a2-55c9-3a51-d62886d7d061@htt-consult.com> <F318A864-CC99-47F7-BEFF-608F93AEB451@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:59:13 -0700
From: "Christopher Wood" <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: saag@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/evMIEPovNr1XXs9buVHcBRufpD0>
Subject: Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:59:36 -0000

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, at 7:48 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Was the person who asked you to make the change a security person?
> Can you ask them for a rationale?
> 
> I agree perfect forward secrecy is the term of art and we shouldn't 
> create a new one. 

FWIW, +1.

Best,
Chris

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email