Return-Path: <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C391B2E55
 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 04:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hht8gi49C7Cs for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sat, 15 Aug 2015 04:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-am1on0649.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::649])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC741B2E53
 for <saag@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 04:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DBXPR03MB383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.10.15) by
 DBXPR03MB383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.10.15) with Microsoft SMTP
 Server (TLS) id 15.1.231.21; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:31:08 +0000
Received: from DBXPR03MB383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.10.15]) by
 DBXPR03MB383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.10.15]) with mapi id
 15.01.0231.021; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:31:08 +0000
From: "Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
To: David Lloyd-Jones <david.lloydjones@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [saag] NIST requests comments on using ISO/IEC 19790:2012 as the
 U.S. Federal Standard for cryptographic modules
Thread-Index: AQHQ1tZGPR3gW81L/E+kkoHmSC1pRJ4MuYwAgAAynICAAAHtwg==
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:31:08 +0000
Message-ID: <912ED439-7FE4-469C-AB32-AC7B2E32BE9F@rhul.ac.uk>
References: <55CE5A40.3090804@cs.tcd.ie>
 <CAPofZaGT__FmChCWNf=iMsyD4s7c1SpUus2Lm_6ubhA3ayfGqA@mail.gmail.com>,
 <CAG-id0ZYG946xZQrsfrMqyQunLpg=ZeGGP8BcQRVtFE0s7b3DQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG-id0ZYG946xZQrsfrMqyQunLpg=ZeGGP8BcQRVtFE0s7b3DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is )
 smtp.mailfrom=Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk; 
x-originating-ip: [85.255.232.198]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DBXPR03MB383;
 5:WSELZAJ0qDEdYRigTMSkHVhqb0wLcxcGBklc9WQVP7/6abAwsBl8VwSdLQj/MlNyOHyg8prHcI/eIKUa1d2fB5ykRgstK5qPVIRw8XqIAYisRsRodPzfJh+6PYLhEd0hugnG2OzgSdhBeNmRsjbuiQ==;
 24:JO18FRArd4SLrdbkV23iRmtNXqF7VXdavyVdu/jrjDDvipIgs7dQrcBOAn7hBJ+Fkp52yo6mt+vov+c0LPmeVjc+WqQhp2s+XMrrBnS0koo=;
 20:uNXk1VJUd8qatEY0VgKZxow4sVUr+r9tK6xbtFJbdKXXSxL3Shmougqik9Sk60KHihDBAVVCanKdRgDEaNWxeQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DBXPR03MB383;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DBXPR03MB38308B1C9ACC89A3C4F08B6BC7B0@DBXPR03MB383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0;
 RULEID:(601004)(8121501041)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:DBXPR03MB383; BCL:0; PCL:0;
 RULEID:; SRVR:DBXPR03MB383; 
x-forefront-prvs: 06691A4183
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;
 SFS:(10009020)(124975003)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(97736004)(62966003)(106356001)(106116001)(105586002)(68736005)(189998001)(66066001)(64706001)(5002640100001)(122556002)(36756003)(19617315012)(10400500002)(110136002)(5001960100002)(2656002)(92566002)(33656002)(101416001)(82746002)(77096005)(86362001)(102836002)(15975445007)(46102003)(2950100001)(83716003)(87936001)(2900100001)(74482002)(54356999)(76176999)(5001860100001)(50986999)(5001920100001)(19580395003)(40100003)(19580405001)(77156002)(4001540100001)(5001830100001)(81156007)(16236675004)(104396002);
 DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DBXPR03MB383;
 H:DBXPR03MB383.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
 MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; 
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: rhul.ac.uk does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_912ED4397FE4469CAB32AC7B2E32BE9Frhulacuk_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: rhul.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Aug 2015 11:31:08.1743 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2efd699a-1922-4e69-b601-108008d28a2e
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR03MB383
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/fKS99aLEj3M2NtA8u3fDjnFBbB8>
Cc: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [saag] NIST requests comments on using ISO/IEC 19790:2012 as
 the U.S. Federal Standard for cryptographic modules
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>,
 <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>,
 <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:31:15 -0000

--_000_912ED4397FE4469CAB32AC7B2E32BE9Frhulacuk_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Err, no. ISO documents are notorious for not being free. In this case, the =
asking price is 178 Swiss Francs. Not exorbitant but not free either. (Yeah=
, it's free to read the abstract.)

Kenny

On 15 Aug 2015, at 12:24, David Lloyd-Jones <david.lloydjones@gmail.com<mai=
lto:david.lloydjones@gmail.com>> wrote:

Stephen,

None of
http://csrc.nist.gov/news_events/#aug12
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsFIPS.html#140-2
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumbe=
r=3D52906
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=3D52906

is behind a paywall.

What is it you have "heard," Stephen, that has given Phil this avalanche of=
 "reason to object"?

I wouldn't be surprised if some of the documentation within those catalogue=
s costs money.  There was a time in the early days of Oracle when the docs =
for their basic database software cost US$6,000.  I paid US$92 for my IBM e=
quivalent a few years ago, but these are not paywalls.  They are costs of o=
perating docs.

(I suspect that that $6,000 was because Larry knew he was working the Ameri=
can taxpayer over just one time, and in 1983 that was still real money to h=
im: gas for the motorbike, not the jet.)

Is it a question of that sort of thing?

Parenthetically, I notice that the correspondence thread "Information Secur=
ity" over on Google+ has recently fractured in two, I would guess because t=
he main feed is full of juvenile ranting.

-dlj.



On 15 August 2015 at 04:23, Phil Lello <phil@dunlop-lello.uk<mailto:phil@du=
nlop-lello.uk>> wrote:
I'm not in the US or trading with US companies, so presumably not affected,=
 but the paywall alone sounds like a reasonable grounds to object to me - i=
t prevents reasonable review by people with no reason to buy the standard, =
and presumably also creates a smaller pool of suppliers (since it will elim=
inate those who don't buy the spec). {snipped}
_______________________________________________
saag mailing list
saag@ietf.org<mailto:saag@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag

--_000_912ED4397FE4469CAB32AC7B2E32BE9Frhulacuk_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
</head>
<body dir=3D"auto">
<div><span></span></div>
<div>
<div>Err, no. ISO documents are notorious for not being free. In this case,=
 the asking price is 178 Swiss Francs. Not exorbitant but not free either. =
(Yeah, it's free to read the abstract.)<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Kenny</div>
<div><br>
On 15 Aug 2015, at 12:24, David Lloyd-Jones &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:david.llo=
ydjones@gmail.com">david.lloydjones@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">
<div>Stephen,</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>None of&nbsp;</div>
<a href=3D"http://csrc.nist.gov/news_events/#aug12" target=3D"_blank">http:=
//csrc.nist.gov/news_events/#aug12</a><br>
<div><a href=3D"http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsFIPS.html#140-2" targ=
et=3D"_blank">http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsFIPS.html#140-2</a><br>
</div>
<div><a href=3D"http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_de=
tail.htm?csnumber=3D52906" target=3D"_blank">http://www.iso.org/iso/home/st=
ore/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=3D52906</a><br>
</div>
<div><a href=3D"http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=3D5290=
6" target=3D"_blank">http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=
=3D52906</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>is behind a paywall.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>What is it you have &quot;heard,&quot; Stephen, that has given Phil th=
is avalanche of &quot;reason to object&quot;?</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>I wouldn't be surprised if some of the documentation within those cata=
logues costs money.&nbsp; There was a time in the early days of Oracle when=
 the docs for their basic database software cost US$6,000.&nbsp; I paid US$=
92 for my IBM equivalent a few years ago,
 but these are not paywalls.&nbsp; They are costs of operating docs. &nbsp;=
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(I suspect that that $6,000 was because Larry knew he was working the =
American taxpayer over just one time, and in 1983 that was still real money=
 to him: gas for the motorbike, not the jet.)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is it a question of that sort of thing?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Parenthetically, I notice that the correspondence thread &quot;Informa=
tion Security&quot; over on Google&#43; has recently fractured in two, I wo=
uld guess because the main feed is full of juvenile ranting.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>-dlj.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 15 August 2015 at 04:23, Phil Lello <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:phil@dunlop-lello.uk" target=3D"_blank">phil=
@dunlop-lello.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">I'm not in the US or trading with US companies, so presuma=
bly not affected, but the paywall alone sounds like a reasonable grounds to=
 object to me - it prevents reasonable review by people with no reason to b=
uy the standard, and presumably also
 creates a smaller pool of suppliers (since it will eliminate those who don=
't buy the spec). {snipped}</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>saag mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href=3D"mailto:saag@ietf.org">saag@ietf.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag">https://www.ie=
tf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag</a></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_912ED4397FE4469CAB32AC7B2E32BE9Frhulacuk_--

