Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 04 October 2020 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FFF3A02BB for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:41:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LU7wG9jvmWNb for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03E713A017E for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C47J84BVszybs; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 17:41:44 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <B065DBF3-B6BC-44A9-906A-AA51FEA9ADBC@vpnc.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 17:41:44 +0200
Cc: IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 623518903.898404-5a3922620bc7e27abd49b905791fcac5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3EC075C-DFAE-46D3-98C5-D89EB5085FDD@tzi.org>
References: <CABcZeBPPZuRri7vC1gR+asmiyi+ABDA3RA16UHJQbEgW95+q_g@mail.gmail.com> <AD7F2CB8-6312-4E31-A4C9-29E81FDEC17E@huitema.net> <B065DBF3-B6BC-44A9-906A-AA51FEA9ADBC@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/jYkwQSg0CzAUPOXsimOZevUYaq4>
Subject: Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2020 15:41:50 -0000

On 2020-10-04, at 17:17, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> 
> I like Christian's triage (minus the "men”).

+1.

Note that these are classes of capabilities.
It is worth talking about classes of attacks separately.

Grüße, Carsten