Re: [saag] keys under doormats: is our doormat ok?

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Mon, 13 July 2015 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37DD1A9087 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1hUCxOaHFT12 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0138.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D841A9085 for <saag@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.96.17) by DM2PR0301MB0654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.96.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.207.19; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:23:50 +0000
Received: from DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.96.17]) by DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.96.17]) with mapi id 15.01.0207.004; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:23:50 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [saag] keys under doormats: is our doormat ok?
Thread-Index: AQHQvKKIrEkNL7zHsUKyY4fSS38cz53X7lqlgAAXfwCAAAKqAIAAFhcAgAAEMQCAAEf5AIAAH+4A
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:23:50 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR0301MB0655B31EDD0584E2C9019E07A89C0@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <55A26484.7050807@cs.tcd.ie> <87fv4ts9l2.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <C64F2343-6937-44EB-BBA6-6D744BBC79A1@vpnc.org> <CAN40gSui7XrVtuZHLOyGs09ZJc5d20SN9AB4Ftnmav7z-tCW=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGvU-a7CocoadpHP0f+_JCctfVG6y4Qtn0Cu_v9UxKNh=4+ajg@mail.gmail.com> <55A2AD94.3040604@tzi.org> <55A2E9F4.3010908@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <55A2E9F4.3010908@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: bbiw.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [24.16.156.113]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR0301MB0654; 5:jiEE06bmX67Zy4P5+NHBF13IGjE2635O3vJb0r3mrhlX/UQRk0UYsKK5Eqaa7qZuJHVq/uhGJu8YmUZTaXH5HskXarB5+bjfptt5KdLOOgiDTa8NeRRCgp9/gF7gkK/UBDQVl2QUmNwLAFNUTx8zkQ==; 24:TtUGmTyaY8Hw2pS8oeBADXWcADMKtXzcwHLdkDL/7BNJh7vsBYGaS0BOmqQguZcBLx6erQh3DAain3bUsknTYkfBPogVfgIdvrWq0IpVqas=; 20:9PODirIzqtrsl9A9RRWr1HZPEoQVaWS8JIImp4/onDPp6d2rQwnM0AystKJO1i1/HGx8sG0HNZlTtTvgZuPdgA==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR0301MB0654D03C6AB23AF20F9CB1AFA89C0@DM2PR0301MB0654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654;
x-forefront-prvs: 0636271852
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(62966003)(86362001)(106116001)(122556002)(77156002)(99286002)(74316001)(50986999)(54356999)(92566002)(76176999)(189998001)(2950100001)(107886002)(86612001)(5001960100002)(2900100001)(66066001)(5003600100002)(46102003)(40100003)(5001770100001)(5001920100001)(2656002)(76576001)(102836002)(87936001)(33656002)(77096005)(5002640100001)(93886004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0654; H:DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Jul 2015 00:23:50.0572 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR0301MB0654
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/jv6BIG8LynIElhNRvEwzYmHXB7s>
Subject: Re: [saag] keys under doormats: is our doormat ok?
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:23:53 -0000

> So I suggest that one of the plenaries contain a capsule summary -- bulleted list -- of the points
> folk think should be made in the revision, and that a 'sense of the room' be taken during the plenary.

General agreement, but I would rather not call this a revision. Maybe something like "reaffirm."

> And that the result of that polling be cited in the IETF's documentation about the intended draft and then in the draft itself.

Yes.


-- Christian Huitema