[saag] DOTS WG report
Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> Thu, 30 July 2020 07:16 UTC
Return-Path: <valery@smyslov.net>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8243A0EF4; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43-MmnweNkIY; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BE23A0EA5; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2I0G95KgZTIp2z+4RA6iNQLHMm1AmbW7kPQIFcbOgpA=; b=LN+PFfxBX7UGsWjiCMX1paBcik MuS14ND7REnbTvsXopBAi4653EKzwVybTeq1uAy4Q5ofF+1tmi34NG6e+fI+J07/z7tdaMKHpuFlK oSUFt6mr/yOhwyYgcK0DAmPdzDT5YzxEmwnKt7Z7VkzfIWRpyOd9UOG8cmvzWTIGc9yjcE2maaBN3 uuEYo678AHfxgTt0ne/YVMr5V+AmtqpMH2NBeHjqHsfvEZtMBrnaCgkhJpU3HaQTHIjF/JygD7RU2 Q8lRMtSkiOctcRo67FSj3BkqPq8xr1szN5npRXSq983M4aDttU+e5daNOtj0i3+0uJT+XaC9COXG/ VEZHzSDg==;
Received: from [82.138.51.3] (port=60112 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <valery@smyslov.net>) id 1k12nW-0007W7-Kv; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 03:16:14 -0400
From: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
To: saag@ietf.org
Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org
References: <122901d6657a$34b80920$9e281b60$@smyslov.net>
In-Reply-To: <122901d6657a$34b80920$9e281b60$@smyslov.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:16:14 +0300
Message-ID: <148901d66641$51844a60$f48cdf20$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHYcJwCsygGZcHEmt0fs09zuiAbF6kboQag
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/lD9sDys_6IoALSlfDanKd6GNjvU>
Subject: [saag] DOTS WG report
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:16:20 -0000
DOTS WG didn't meet at IETF107 and is not meeting at IETF108. We had a virtual interim meeting in June. Since IETF 106: 1. Two new RFCs that comprise a core of DOTS protocol have been published: - RFC 8782 (DOTS Signal Channel) - RFC 8783 (DOTS Data Channel) 2. A significant progress was done for DOTS Telemetry draft, which will soon be ready for WGLC 3. DOTS Multihoming draft is still under slow development Unfortunately, shortly after RFC 8782 has been published, a problem with its YANG Module has been discovered, which can cause interoperability issues. The decision was made to publish a 8782-bis RFC and an initial draft for it currently ready for adoption. The plan is to quickly publish it as a new Signal Channel RFC and delay processing of DOTS documents that reference Signal Channel YANG Module until it is done.
- [saag] DOTS WG report Valery Smyslov