IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 13 January 2021 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E269F3A09B7; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:02:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06O00TOq_1gq; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 499F93A09A4; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 10D31r5k004465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 22:01:57 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:01:52 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@nightwatchcybersecurity.com>
Cc: draft-foudil-securitytxt@ietf.org, Security Area Advisory Group <saag@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210113030152.GD161@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20200630222455.GX58278@kduck.mit.edu> <CAAyEnSPoj20pGzDH328yiTLn=O3LXrO8QBQMMsgd8QttLdT-Jg@mail.gmail.com> <20200721054121.GE41010@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200721054121.GE41010@kduck.mit.edu>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/moI_jkb2GYJezfc13IxS4EYRL5U>
Subject: Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:02:02 -0000

Hi Yakov, all,

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:41:21PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 08:14:33PM -0400, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
> > 
> > All of the changes I am making are going into this pull request:
> > https://github.com/securitytxt/security-txt/pull/192
> 
> Thanks for the pointer; I've left that tab open and will try to take a look
> tomorrow/in the morning.

[the updates did land fairly shortly thereafter]

I've gotten a chance to look over the updates in the -09 and -10, and I
currently believe that they are responsive to the comments received during
the last call, and especially so to my summary/next steps assessment after
the last call had completed.  Accordingly, I plan to move forward with IESG
Evaluation for it.

To SAAG: if you feel that your review comments were not adequately
addressed, please let me know, and I will be happy to discuss them further
with you.

Thanks,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email