IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] AD Sponsorship of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 10 June 2021 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FEB3A1A7A for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGedCiVsDplG for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03053A1A78 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCEF300BF3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:22:02 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id iMYa3jq8og_H for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 299CE300B96; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <418C66BE-E450-4081-89BD-B04A158D33FA@redhoundsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:21:55 -0400
Cc: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B50649D9-30C2-4BB5-8562-026EA4AB3E5F@vigilsec.com>
References: <12861641c9f345868f3201bfac6c3db9@cert.org> <2474C9E1-2860-4648-BD94-1A084CFA21A4@sn3rd.com> <418C66BE-E450-4081-89BD-B04A158D33FA@redhoundsoftware.com>
To: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/nTOZnHrBVzgazfKiyUiKSU45FEM>
Subject: Re: [saag] AD Sponsorship of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:22:09 -0000

> On 6/9/21, 11:03 AM, "saag on behalf of Sean Turner" <saag-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
>    Roman,
> 
>    I have but one point to raise and then some cosmetic nits (cosmetic because compilers ignore whitespace).
> 
>    0) Point to Raise:
> 
>    re: AllWantBacks. I am not entirely sure whether what is there for swb-ers-all WANT-BACK merely defines the new value or whether it also adds it to the list of available AllWantBacks.  AllWantBacks is imported from RFC 5912:
> 
>    AllWantBacks WANT-BACK ::= {
>         WantBackSet | ACertWantBackSet | AnyWantBackSet, ...
>     }
> 
>    To add swb-ers-all to the list, I wonder whether merely defining it is enough. Is there something more that needs to be done to get it into the list as the fourth option?
> 
> [CW] The swb-ers-all does not impact AllWantBacks. It was simply a shorthand means of saying "I want an EvidenceRecord for everything in replyWantBacks". See the last paragraph of section 3 in RFC5276. The ExpandedWantBacks in this draft is a superset of AllWantBacks. Unless I am missing something, I do not see a concern. 


I agree.  I do not see a concern here.

Russ

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email