[saag] Discovery: can it be solved
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sat, 13 November 2021 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2600E3A0773 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 08:02:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AVckxvlAJjsB for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 08:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACFDF3A076C for <saag@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 08:02:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id o8so50650505edc.3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 08:02:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F1XeaXChN5K91uJhKWMMa0yB51wxuCStDYPejWojuBI=; b=jmWxRX9E2+FcFXqGq6zdFXUISFSoOstkyInTOD36evQwjzf2ahcX2r0cXL09Osn/Fl x1j/UV9RVi05nadzYJpoyF+1mr4eZhm5J05DuCe4ri5DAaY9H4LIBM6Qft4aF0UFaQKL cv2RLmSHXl4oTmgjiiU78qRN8H087yDWs+mLRoKvC7VcFtGwwCTN/WIZZgarBvSQJU/I 8Dy+7pUvlfrDYXrrqAHzO9wuacCe3gJuE4gvVmWIvaKfZr42y+ase32fXv2rlQ5GDWM0 qdqkXG9BjgTUqNOO12LxIjmjW+6/b1WePtYarATGiee1uRUYj9I77bZB+yfPURUBzjss O7hQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F1XeaXChN5K91uJhKWMMa0yB51wxuCStDYPejWojuBI=; b=J9734t3HG1q0EzgnS0Ty61V6OjjgTPamtAfie8CiXO8pT2Fln42NBx7oBYsZkqF6vC R8lsF8qxIJTaXtJ66u+2O5qyXdHHr8UXIck5EHIaAy0yE1erxzBNB81yY6DKdD3K3jCP 22MxViiHXn0XMntreELGfnmEIgF1Q1AKmr6iMPRZQTlfKDjK2bV9KFhLbeVzC0zZCSXh 8a95o7raxULHXri7d2niTOkoZbMohdvzw7V/luss+n05eA55vhgRWAErlDdQiSQCos+2 DriIWk6Wzg5Nr0BAQatsSZSg4vBIX5oEKIm1l+uAcEZGBLQ+qTMGW/jfgYCW/lMp4lXA hvHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531v17DkuMyq0fh146ohGuJfndZpO5QLlA3zg3gLZ34IVTA/Qzi8 i79K+xI0Yg2sxJpd48MINEs9o8oxb/z0qZNW4WQXoXcO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7pqhMDmT4nWP70wQgW2PZVvFNapn/o5HiZtm+3VfSg4kGux6xWWyoXrjkyic5AofYWzVo2Rr+XzKQMUDkgJ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee19:: with SMTP id g25mr10302977eds.162.1636819020376; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 07:57:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 07:56:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cnEJR6otnxoYL8SZsKT830YtEMhNU8AV2FM+iHcM+BT5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/qg_2YucVOpDmvm_Z5a5j31_I320>
Subject: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:02:36 -0000
Dear Saag, It seems that a large number of proposals, from OHAI, DOH, Privacy Pass and most recently some IP privacy work have received the same kind of pushback around 'discovery': the argument that we need a mechanism for clients to find a large list of available and willing intermediaries. The challenge here is that we have not seen a proposal, and it doesn't seem to answer the real issues about diversity of intermediates, user trust in what they discover, or address any of the very real issues around user experience. I think this is a necessary discussion to have once rather than constantly relitigate. Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
- [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Watson Ladd
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Antoine FRESSANCOURT
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Martin Thomson
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Michael Richardson
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved David Schinazi
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Ted Hardie
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved David Schinazi
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Watson Ladd
- Re: [saag] Discovery: can it be solved Tony Rutkowski