Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> Wed, 14 April 2021 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9123A1690; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 02:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEQWNgJtrmhf; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 02:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GBR01-LO2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr100074.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.10.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40283A1693; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 02:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jSug1EE4lIwLp7oB0m9O69DFN3azjrzhIiXOuxEA1amzNSHAEte4wirWFs+PtWkpo3RULaj1tM2yx5pCweZ7IVW9ppcXMdHXPdnfOuZl23NkfRMrJfwg7++wnkXCKpB5fEOYwDCAK8/u2qCwJRiBiscCdPfVbKr/Rn0onCzWCsojk3JVegqp+Fm4nLfD9t314HQUHVgQZpUE42LbX7SO0lxPZfsYkbfHiR2Wb4T4QrtymPX5kaQzLIx0ldsUEyzBsm7Xynjm6H4sr1CHG+sEUt61eeT/QXOtBdFlxd53OtKQ95frpqRfF7BHRC3zYd18j1hAgSU6mK8uRX2T5Ql7HA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=wOxhUJfiHILFD+LwRGiWsiYoKkl7o5+frWh5vQZ5CYY=; b=OHgIMP2kK3KjPkTWGfWI+BFQSWXbcS97KszG4OT6F4w1Pkct2p9A7lnx7I7235jrJ4hPEhGdnVI0Oj1Q+jzYh2sv8DiExl504PyRGLnRyHV84IqcWNeoj42ncbghMaj0epXhzQ7M+mb8IEW8lHLRJLAX7KRptG494f9Kdbb6mM5EUjTLS/bz9kWstbUmX9PTwrVUAqIiXQj3hV9BZ98V4UDc/V7CFOyO/rSsu7xpjRPuDemtD/MGsgQKLQpGX9NTLXd1HFCUPuim8fgDGaWjyKXvUmh1nF1KjAw02fXPxLAzhg+xIvzqtNC4W8Ca37vI71RbsGMiBXM3O8b8SZH2Cw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manchester.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=manchester.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=manchester.ac.uk; arc=none
Received: from LO0P265MB2986.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:184::9) by LOYP265MB2173.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:110::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.22; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:00:55 +0000
Received: from LO0P265MB2986.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::8088:4602:d179:2e9e]) by LO0P265MB2986.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::8088:4602:d179:2e9e%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4020.023; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:00:55 +0000
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, Yakov Shafranovich <yakov@nightwatchcybersecurity.com>
Thread-Topic: [art] [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
Thread-Index: AQHXMJe3QFo8O+lXyEKs6qsGiriCoaqy0rQAgACXsYCAAF6JgA==
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:00:55 +0000
Message-ID: <5F841FEF-7985-424B-A925-336AC3265D8F@manchester.ac.uk>
References: <CAAyEnSMBdXCA0EvgR79P_1gi15pAPfeyu_HgGqgMjWxRP8sxKg@mail.gmail.com> <C7B5DB45-F0A1-491C-AD4E-91F67C8C182E@cisco.com> <20210413191937.GK9612@localhost> <adf764ae-cb85-5063-0071-cc1461b11f1f@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <adf764ae-cb85-5063-0071-cc1461b11f1f@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.43.20110804
authentication-results: bbiw.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;bbiw.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=manchester.ac.uk;
x-originating-ip: [2001:8b0:a657:68e3:d08c:7f95:a3d:f697]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 63adc707-0728-4c11-7867-08d8ff23d032
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: LOYP265MB2173:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <LOYP265MB21739225276717394C7D16C9DD4E9@LOYP265MB2173.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:LO0P265MB2986.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(33656002)(38100700002)(36756003)(2616005)(53546011)(316002)(122000001)(76116006)(4326008)(6506007)(54906003)(6512007)(86362001)(786003)(966005)(71200400001)(478600001)(186003)(66446008)(8676002)(6486002)(66556008)(66476007)(83380400001)(64756008)(66946007)(2906002)(110136005)(5660300002)(8936002)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 5bYskwvaiUqo+XYa77bv6Gl1qzhwI5IQmunXvu8/RvBeABRFVJ7uSV+h8TDY/neKc8jhvr66IvlJ/EdBWKJosnNIvoCikaymGiBsF1QtdFj62OWh8M43S1aJ3eAMKDSTqQwQPs1U6DR56VnPBRMr9+LhUY3jQ80u+RFC3yY4atL/4nUywIm7470WaoJuQM6WVCSRI8qgxxWfaBffeWlliwhTSnT8h1HO0Q4xMWuXbpDlQjKdZFYWOZBwEgxLSlveO0eSUN1PaCkThoUdgs2qzIip6s3ELhG/QnrGco1O87zZ20OgkOukrwPqzFTyb2hHK4iSaDtOqnf4vEzIFp80EmubKxUUN6frVQCxvjTyOEOgNgGfeA2K2d5mgen8bkAyNpO0mVSasOYPMPn++sIqpSY22rcJRaVdzEWqi7/OHbxCo1/Ca9y6N6caGVQiHoNKRPXvLhYrx6aYLMMBqKH61HBkD+tNCPC5X6pIfvcikTrsd/3yT3uN2esUcRl+kScxPLS8EIrbnR4jMOpcK1KiCrGZBXvV7jWYae55Y7eFESM/byNtfP/8QOA9YcYktbHBUADussGUoQXIrgLqeX1ueG79tOTWZ11tNH9x6qRqAS4j6R6rVL4/4GoOf4NV8wXfMtMPRy3HN/L4BjIAfwRKXSCaoAr0Or90VqbFOYAkGhkkrN21dbor3Nm7JhwyspKm+TxfavszBARoT8fovRE9DmU4q2B8Jpm8AnUrb/+xNJl21a9BrIWv8oCv/FMc6jp7K+BtfuawQx116weSeyilmW3xcWwmHowNoJOOipr389sgSn0wfU9IWRBCRfUmQRSgmrTaTbopOe4g0bniwctHWZXVn4vP2sIJthNBEIeBpNaLDPn8JxRjUFMO8nxMKXgY0mpaLBLldPTr5VtJabEwkX6xVPqDMaCfdDjgiFLqlVOvctLg91tFVeiu/U8SfJ1rw/P25wQ9CuQcHu1zAEcGRW/3coidm1zxLzPJkVSvZ/hjm0YdrF2PYcLfYvWdWPoBjZAGWI31XHkRae7TP5o9bs/abxKoNbegirkg6dXamH7CWkHbCQJiKhgSP2Evy+LMtPOj/0yiWlRqOmow7anXmWuzhjk73yPciHqIMstOJ959A6jrkCvBZFbNRppgPPtFkNmwHtEr6UO2TBFuS1vgTVKJj8149rtFn1SiJojb5ZffqY83e4gIotcQcBoQ7+joF3k28g73Vk81tQqAmDY33HNyQZvEjUo0S02HTGsr8ZaGRxL/m5gwpGL4t0FO/On7QRK/w7YSi+16jgyIPzkQTt+xCJNH77tu33wGEQX7gGqgSUjmRoV520RdjxANzAR5M1rMoSpVhK/9gMiuMwPUjDKCYGchrbk2jT/SjH3FrmQ0YIEKCFVOQAHNGdlwmzoX
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9A2AAE08ACCC4F4EA1A9DEF3F80AAD7A@GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: manchester.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: LO0P265MB2986.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 63adc707-0728-4c11-7867-08d8ff23d032
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Apr 2021 09:00:55.4194 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: c152cb07-614e-4abb-818a-f035cfa91a77
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: BqMMEBoGvZEOYYJ0s7W6dDW7Rlw6psTKqKLEu9pc/XXhxJrJCTCuJHNHFYVqtrqSlAF7T5vEci2AchxS2ENd21HFqasDCRn8JaRuXixLUWM=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: LOYP265MB2173
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/ulHfBvpUvbJ_5ESF4PEUE0YPm5M>
Subject: Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:01:05 -0000
I would say for this particular example of security logs you should use ISO8601 (aka RFC3339), as it is more important when it happened/expires internationally rather than what timezone it happened in. In that case it should also be UTC-based or have an explicit timezone, e.g. considering "Zero day" - which day? As a side effect dates are also nicely sortable! -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, The University of Manchester https://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 Please note that I may work flexibly – whilst it suits me to email now, I do not expect a response or action outside of your own working hours. On 2021-04-14, 05:23, "art on behalf of Dave Crocker" <art-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote: On 4/13/2021 12:19 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > English-centric much?:) The RFC5322 date format was not designed for use as extensive as venues speaking English. It's original target for use was restricted only to North America (cf, RFC733). I thought it quite exciting to even include Atlantic Standard Time, as well as the zones for Hawaii and Alaska, although getting the latter turned into a bit of an exercise. I was working at The Rand Corporation at the time and had been told that the Librarian there had magical research skills. The timezone topic finally prompted my contacting her and asking for help. She said she'd see what she could find. I don't think it was as much as a half-hour before she called back with the answer. I was duly impressed. (Astonished would be the more apt word.) So I asked her how she found the answer that quickly. She told me she call the phone company's information operator for Juneau and asked her what they called their timezone. She then repeated the exercise for Oahu... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ art mailing list art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art
- [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Eliot Lear (elear)
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Tim Bray
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… John C Klensin
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Randy Bush
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Ned Freed
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Michael Douglass
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Dave Crocker
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Alan DeKok
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Tony Finch
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… heather flanagan
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… tom petch
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Steve Allen
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… heather flanagan
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Stian Soiland-Reyes
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Henry Story
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Peter Gutmann
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Tony Finch
- Re: [saag] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 5322 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Steve Allen
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Mark Baushke (ietf)
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Metapolymath Majordomo
- Re: [saag] [art] Date formats: RFC3339 vs. RFC 53… Yakov Shafranovich