Re: [saag] Two sessions?
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 31 October 2021 16:43 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8C83A0E29;
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id RjRCo2zJ4Tpn; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BD93A0DF0;
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.10.227] (76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net
[76.209.242.70]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 19VGgxSq008950
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:43:00 -0700 (MST)
(envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host
76-209-242-70.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net [76.209.242.70] claimed to be
[10.10.10.227]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: saag <saag@ietf.org>, IETF SecDispatch <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 09:43:24 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5798)
Message-ID: <25FD63E5-1CD2-44C8-B526-185ADB249AEB@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <2AAD27E7-53DF-44BD-9C80-6ABE7679E6AE@akamai.com>
References: <2AAD27E7-53DF-44BD-9C80-6ABE7679E6AE@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_MailMate_3E34AD6E-DD11-4730-8010-2E360A7CF448_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"plain":[44, 89],
"uuid":"3B96A94B-06FA-440A-88F2-F7B3710469C3"}]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/wJUa1im50LhJ6ADU16uAOkZxFSU>
Subject: Re: [saag] Two sessions?
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>,
<mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 16:43:32 -0000
On 31 Oct 2021, at 6:11, Salz, Rich wrote: > There are two sessions for SAAG/SecDispatch, each split as one hour? > Is that correct? Also: when will the agendas for SAAG and SecDispatch be posted? Some of us are trying to juggle conflicts. --Paul Hoffman
- [saag] Two sessions? Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Two sessions? Paul Hoffman
- Re: [saag] [Secdispatch] Two sessions? Mohit Sethi M
- Re: [saag] [Secdispatch] Two sessions? Roman Danyliw