[saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> (Using ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records) to Informational RFC

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 01 May 2014 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6B61A6F74 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yj9D3HWv-bOm for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0DA1A6F7F for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 08:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C6DBE70 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 16:02:46 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EFHT6JB8EYQh for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 16:02:46 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B296BE6E for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 16:02:46 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <53626216.6070903@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 16:02:46 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
References: <20140501145735.18958.1971.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140501145735.18958.1971.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/wSihwybTnlRJSrkOp_8-_RWD9fo
Subject: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> (Using ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 15:02:55 -0000

FYI, this was discussed briefly here and has been
discussed on the old secsh (ssh) WG mailing list.

IETF LC has started.

S


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Last Call: <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> (Using
ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records) to Informational RFC
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 07:57:35 -0700
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Using ED25519 in SSHFP Resource Records'
  <draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt> as Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-05-29. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   The Ed25519 signature algorithm has been implemented in OpenSSH.
   This document updates the IANA "SSHFP RR Types for public key
   algorithms" registry by adding an algorithm number for Ed25519.



The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

Note that there is no current standardised format for the input
to the hash function here, but there are two implementations
of this so a codepoint is needed and useful. A standard public
key format is likely to be developed in future (but could take
some time) at which point it may make sense to assign another
codepoint, but there are no issues with codepoint scarcity here
so that seems like it will work given the implemeners seem ok
with it, even if its not ideal.