Re: [sacm] Clarification from last IETF Session

Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00C03A1C64 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqfeVIICZXlw for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 342EC3A1C62 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id v19-20020a0568300913b029028423b78c2dso4028986ott.8 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FKYuv8K9RDT3WkvRuy6KbaYeSOcEhd8SQY2+d6OZmIA=; b=R6JJtfMMDUnvb9wZqwOp46aegbTb5mihVFUZiL1eIaIqbMk09Jp/OJ6CjrtFa4UPci tD1O63N3h0jIbXN1fK42k9TXde6hMn75g4VH3U6Gpb25mGEEAZSnvGzwO+Jy13Yj3QeY J3KvWhzU51LvwhOCCKQxk52mzKK5cFFtDsr9Ab4HqLeoIV8BRQBdAH6AzQOTtfhElVYA XQxmSMiBuDPKPtjM+PS2CxqqKoPQH4nI8Ep4A/IZC0ohYKSVHEnPi1H8e+t91vb6FPXY ZJE5NSyvUygrXvwuQ4Hi4rAkBGv/dUkJuM5E9Cy/5JewIMpK5DGttZ3OQvOwbyq6VbW/ ITww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FKYuv8K9RDT3WkvRuy6KbaYeSOcEhd8SQY2+d6OZmIA=; b=NMVU5wXK4/KxeMnMS8zgcUJnTMmC/QEld4COhfyU/WG13jx7TvOhLTZhb8C3NgcOQk hBz7bOyLHCz7S7tjZcnMNkHQ2OmvIErYDrJo20RMcsMpKBnUyc6nl6ymCGdmD6R22B7n 3QOmj99CjAetywiSdDWdUasl/65Xj/KkxR+DD9DaoDzJRyiHFrO2xHv4nwhJfx+z28lx 2/+BCcEXi2T3fyUa43q9IPXgjZs2p+Oq3h332v/Daars/o7E6T38A8aeLeXBEnp/GAo8 /O+xUbY75grSxl5x5TBRf81bKyCpKmLHNocNjSuJ+3+wwRoDbCOEPDOXjcYcIvlcVAr8 o+9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TazXa+Wa7AAupbJKpJAPKmuZ6gIhHqPUC70CmZismPoNekFrz ytrXeZ0M9PsnRKX6z5p5dZvwbhwpzBc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzW40SlkKeKh5C/Q5F9jrta8iQWzAh1gW6ndmILMXA8ClReatOMjvL/YwWtmplJ6A9eKYiu2Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1d6a:: with SMTP id m97mr17419253otm.322.1618231577061; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbkpro-2043-amontville.lan (cpe-70-121-86-117.austin.res.rr.com. [70.121.86.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e20sm2633207otl.15.2021.04.12.05.46.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d9de2a50-2aa3-abf6-c221-ed604f34398c@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:46:15 -0500
Cc: sacm <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F515770-29A2-4D13-BE4F-F1CFAA9B7B3F@gmail.com>
References: <49BDC54D-DD6F-45A4-9B7B-395A3E9E2E50@gmail.com> <570DB4ED-9D63-43BA-A290-F3428470DE42@gmail.com> <d9de2a50-2aa3-abf6-c221-ed604f34398c@sit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/5POEoEFNYG47i8GIem89PjBzWG0>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Clarification from last IETF Session
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:46:23 -0000

Hi Henk,

Thanks for the reply. For some reason, I thought there was another person as well, but I must be misremembering.

Kind regards,

Adam

> On Apr 12, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Adam,
> 
> a fellow co-author just pointed this email out to me again. It might be your inquiry refers to some work in TCG that I mentioned. And yes: pending a mapping to the sacm architecture, that (not yet public) work could definitely check some boxes here.
> 
> Viele Grüße,
> 
> Henk
> 
> On 02.04.21 14:30, Adam Montville wrote:
>> No one has any recollection of this (or can confirm that I’m imagining things)?
>>> On Mar 24, 2021, at 11:52 AM, Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> All:
>>> 
>>> I seem to remember, during the architecture discussion at our last session, that there was someone else (other than CIS) interested in implementing at least a piece of the architecture. Did I invent this in my own mind, or is there some truth to it?
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> 
>>> Adam
>> _______________________________________________
>> sacm mailing list
>> sacm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm