Re: [sacm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-epcp

Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> Fri, 08 May 2020 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <inacio@cert.org>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6E53A0ACF for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLATegPDespp for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E958B3A053E for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 048DjSEb017135; Fri, 8 May 2020 09:45:29 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu 048DjSEb017135
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1588945529; bh=0ktWK7ePCnrepfWRYJO91FIlUxSuO+9XkZx9uNEdgWc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q11vD0WPeyXErKvx2t2RoLCO4dCs43h0Mx3J+o67DnxS8RSRxH/tAXIkN8vnTtsfK UTqjpC6edXAavm+lDmcb6lnskGgakm2R8fS4kdVRy1uIA0Ed/aPs/amq/Wwqqaou4l d8WDikKaQ9/W4UTI3bFk8SVkY5Q4yqippH5tKIZ0=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 048DjMuW022163; Fri, 8 May 2020 09:45:24 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (10.64.28.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 8 May 2020 09:45:21 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 8 May 2020 09:45:21 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%22]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.007; Fri, 8 May 2020 09:45:21 -0400
From: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
CC: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sacm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-epcp
Thread-Index: AQHWIjHH7Hp2duSpjE6u8sDljOuc8qic+DuAgAAHlYCAAXygAA==
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:45:21 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.5eb56269.132b8486.9a33@cert.org>
References: <786B1755-7120-4C50-A4EC-84780846101D@isoc.org> <39b0ccd2-60b2-e0c9-c3f4-e782da0e66f3@sit.fraunhofer.de> <CAN40gSv8TtoX1Qc66J+nmjSNRmOf-4i9ze=vaTooFWNaUaSv+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN40gSv8TtoX1Qc66J+nmjSNRmOf-4i9ze=vaTooFWNaUaSv+g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.202.74]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan5eb56269132b84869a33certorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/9F5mu4LNYrx6gnj92_YmA8DM5aQ>
Subject: Re: [sacm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-epcp
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 13:45:47 -0000

+1 - this is ready to go.



--
Chris Inacio
inacio@cert.org


From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com><mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: May 7, 2020 at 11:03:23 AM
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de><mailto:henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com><mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Cc: sacm@ietf.org <sacm@ietf.org><mailto:sacm@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org><mailto:odonoghue@isoc.org>
Subject:  Re: [sacm] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-epcp

Hi,

+1

This EPCP draft is ready to proceed to IETF Last Call in my opinion.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com<mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:36 AM Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de<mailto:henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>> wrote:
Hi list,

a ton of comments went into that I-D over the span of the last year and
I am happy to see it advance.

Hence, I am in favor of moving this I-D on.

Viele Grüße,

Henk

On 04.05.20 18:33, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This message starts a very quick 1 week WGLC to give working group members one final chance to give the document a quick read. Please note this document has been around for a long time and is quite mature. This is not the time to reengineer the solution or the document.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-epcp/
>
> The EPCP document has previously been through a WGLC.
> https://mailarchive.ietf..org/arch/msg/sacm/NlF9yI5VMdiTgUcRHJ5jdExfHqo/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/NlF9yI5VMdiTgUcRHJ5jdExfHqo/>
> This resulted in a number of changes including a name change and changing from BCP to Standards Track. The resulting updated document represents the consensus of the working group.
>
> Thanks,
> Karen and Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org<mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

_______________________________________________
sacm mailing list
sacm@ietf.org<mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
_______________________________________________
sacm mailing list
sacm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm