IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] next steps for draft-ietf-sacm-arch

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Tue, 16 November 2021 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C01F3A03C9 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:01:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIAutgsGOlaU for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa35.google.com (mail-vk1-xa35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EFCF3A02BE for <sacm@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa35.google.com with SMTP id u68so4496364vke.11 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:01:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U+VA4J2i2LnAg2ZeSz9LPlBOc81ZCqwtc2zRdJV2KKM=; b=SGHkQNq7DaRF7sRAGehzllB4vCrZ7oLRMs39uESABX1bbmLQz9ni3jeD75ovNH0mpW +CwQ9VgK0YrmCrFCKzzK8Itnr4FBjlapZMOtdAlh7e9GJgqXWbrZ60K/xfJ+MBcrldv+ 8+Yg5yOZPn0eJg+NyTfkvpW96L96Y26HI9asVwspRIEDpbEnMoJUWK38+CqLyDKI6JOB d8ekfGarmf1HllPY4I5sJDMuB0et1BkAhcmh3NNo15+cgy10aHtq9FXiOCw/A8nc5Jct OtSuoDZdnoPNIZosPOdBIg4t8rBkmq1L4N5KPaB8qBTNG82t33ghKO2LTXFNBa8SnYJy ZTOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U+VA4J2i2LnAg2ZeSz9LPlBOc81ZCqwtc2zRdJV2KKM=; b=4a7Q2sOH6btBUcjyTzo8ExyOB5UCT+4GMb72f2Ofq5uAZAx1zpmoV5h4Yoc93F3fAx 0GUpAIELnDXlZTUEvW2Wg/AHFynxVgER2Gizqk7HYrjGDi6dkNbFwj451r1zdCO3yNxG GsppdNKzSqyR5nmeOXPrzzpN5nlRcn0InLeqp7fWVe6vWvz7CMQQ8iwNyqmQ1eE0pSv5 fmN99iODiyH6op8+vbuwZrokc3aAnuQN9ZRY2v8YcxJT/ac/wcYXtxorHPDaKU7kcIaH tENyPT87bBDNqsQeyBwb2+N0lb/suIz3HNq1FDiFxQBZR2AMUAP55tva9Ac4dYeGcowZ ImLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311mbm8ZKDqP+fkMX9uHAyBJSzSJ8vNt/jsZSvk+ZTmfeWW9yJ/ kIQ6RYI+9Sj32iN+0HGGSb/o8usSVHnJ2YOzE9uey2jm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjWM8vdqosRydoYBL+ZxdUd4Y4hlTaVRSAMVR4833yFTX9d3TBvgKB6NLEtArRJVBHjl0gDTs/A0ANmSdGfQ0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cdfa:: with SMTP id v26mr76468317vkn.12.1637085668564; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:01:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH0PR06MB7061E46B0F8590AF1012A970C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR06MB7061E46B0F8590AF1012A970C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:00:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN40gSuhqt_wNoG0qFxeKeo59_9w10fRjmxzerTwvM7A_cNjNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Cc: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bde3a805d0ebb510"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/M7XSnqvFRNoq4DaDt_oiXzYB9HU>
Subject: Re: [sacm] next steps for draft-ietf-sacm-arch
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:01:15 -0000

Hi Karen,

Given that the IETF SACM WG is wrapping up, I suggest that letting SACM
Architecture expire
makes sense, because it can no longer constrain any SACM component
protocols (all of which
would be create, if at all, *after* SACM WG is closed).

Cheers,
- Ira

*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*

*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*

*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
<blueroofmusic@gmail.com>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:21 AM Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:

> Hi!
>
>
>
> At the IETF 112 WG meeting, the level of energy around
> draft-ietf-sacm-arch was concerning to us.  A call for reviewers elicited
> no volunteers.  A historical look at the mailing list also shows little to
> no WG discussion for over a year despite there being a number of open items
> to address.  We have consulted with the draft authors, and they feel the
> right next step should be to let the document expire.
>
>
>
> We’d like to check with the WG to confirm continued interest in finishing
> draft-ietf-sacm-arch.  Are there any volunteers to join the editorial team
> or contribute text to finish the document within the next several months?
> Are there volunteers to review the document? Please speak up immediately if
> this work is important to you.
>
>
> In the absence of volunteers, there doesn’t appear to be sufficient energy
> in the WG to finish the work. In that case, there is no choice left but to
> let the I-D expire.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Karen and Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email