IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)

David Waltermire <notifications@github.com> Thu, 18 February 2021 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644963A12E4 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:44:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.57, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzZuxpEPYTmB for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36FEA3A12DA for <sacm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-d2dec1b.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.16.35]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4DE1E5606F5 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:44:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1613659471; bh=iqnJwmZozA7tfI7ca1Q9gYzusb2M1EWjffuI7uasYkE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=fii7mtcIH5rOxptE0PRxMoDSgcOH+jJ7YdT6g/2UAI4jdZyaSKu4coA5z2uE2QK/t voXHHtfLXatx2/v2+JNGA0pvxPUP8MZXcDF3E7QSBri89eFxRQjKQ3iw+Rgtc1jxLc 4QM4gY7gq0onA2ce5P/Jn8XvvEGoTCYOw5kre4iw=
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 06:44:31 -0800
From: David Waltermire <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <reply+ACTMJUO66CP2FNG4N4OTS2N6HJPE7EVBNHHCVTIOG4@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <draft-ietf-sacm-coswid@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/27/781392110@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/27@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/27@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_602e7d4f4b586_521a541185b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: david-waltermire-nist
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/OmomjGd2iXOi289kZ_hUFPEAOwM>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:44:33 -0000

I believe we should follow the spec as it is normative, not the XSD. So we should restrict the payload and evidence to a single optional instance.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/27#issuecomment-781392110

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email