IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Consensus call on SACM WG way forward (March 2021)

Bill Munyan <bill.munyan.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 March 2021 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.munyan.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F1C3A144A for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:40:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJd6D0ahyi0V for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 715343A144B for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:40:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id g185so17695480qkf.6 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:40:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=q8KG9DHp+OXfwUHID3ZtvAxx33SU2Gsbt1W9Y9k+5jE=; b=OAN1zm2itDZJLryuvIGF8w0XIH4IRft6UpbYHEFlg+iisdY1VxPbslU5QaVdz79/mz rCEPA7kZVPcje8orVfV00AOFx1J89yikO5A9nDd5ryljcm2tEHHHNpn39fm80G19rstx /XWi4prMIqMSFOUMbwNuEAFh2+LTh8xpmx04ZtFheOLfAih2Vqw4j111BdQY2KhfHPNe 83s675WlCRqiTvmBssWjDNAJXbPNXPUykspkpwFyyzP4s42ab9hunH3iXKFHRDehCtoT krymciFTCoQZB0rv2rsfpasB6tj6J/HHl5LWwve30vlaG8ucFpmVBWIxB8gJaYycMdfo mmGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=q8KG9DHp+OXfwUHID3ZtvAxx33SU2Gsbt1W9Y9k+5jE=; b=LXOkTaP7qwmQl7hHm5v5QSfVhuYxn+l54ct1KYSakMHZ4+p30fphGya9Rmd3dqej+z tjRzUwwYcU04qwecAUV9XEHIRonr6nfBd/zoSKvM4mvth3UQDP5rh8Jdob4FfU9xJX1q hB27RKIj40sS3E85WqhZizPXYfKhDmzCdL4wJ1HrtbYeFlRecx1Zg8UzSO27Kn6eTejy t+h9OgO2bI8EbfOofdC+iHlP9P08Rdmv4C4cp/loDvWrnVzEVigDPRaGDRtfkXeOb7Md s6CJzwKtUEgHJxj/jR+HxwGK2MOhs7lLw/mwBVaDsKTKz4KO04rapoiWDu5piOl6wA29 0Uqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pHrjg5EiAKBfZ54FFkixMZIDLdH++e/6YLJb9gXpMo/mYiNZ7 DCaYS9/petV9bev8RDa0HI7IXq5fGZ0OkdSFdCPu5NLDBxw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVMSsIMDQPUkMGgpka7tmyRHb6LFjbv8B7j5TJRXC9CiYFmuI5ubHfyKwM9IC9L/WyKoKUy3nu1aH4UpmEuyU=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8ec4:: with SMTP id q187mr3751171qkd.381.1615397999355; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:39:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO6PR06MB70588EA9A40AA42F537D0FF8C2919@CO6PR06MB7058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR06MB70588EA9A40AA42F537D0FF8C2919@CO6PR06MB7058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Bill Munyan <bill.munyan.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:39:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKUOEQxFhfe7a_7CJJyjqVa=goeUTYyoGegY=d9R3e6JP6V4vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec2a5f05bd322739"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/PKoRTRHNxboXgTNKBes5-KgseOY>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Consensus call on SACM WG way forward (March 2021)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:40:02 -0000

+1

-Bill M.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:55 AM Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:

> SACM WG members,
>
>
>
> During today’s SACM WG meeting, we discussed a way ahead for the SACM
> working group. The proposal that we settled on is:
>
>
>
>    - Drop all the milestones which aren’t CoSWID or Architecture related
>    - Revise the milestone on SACM Architecture to be “Submit SACM
>    Architecture to IESG” by December 2021
>    - Add a milestone “Close or re-charter WG if all planned milestones
>    have not progressed to at least the IESG” by January 2022
>
> This email initiates a one week consensus call on this way forward. This
> will give the working group members that were not present a chance to
> review the chair slides that discussed the motivation, the meeting
> recording, and the meeting minutes (which should be posted later today).
>
>
>
> Please indicate on the mailing list your opinion on this way forward. This
> consensus call will close on next Friday at 19 March 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Karen and Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email