[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)

Thomas Fossati <notifications@github.com> Fri, 09 October 2020 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B37F3A0D89 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRR2ouZiWt6n for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78CF93A0D43 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-33977dc.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.105.59]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B6FED840EC4 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1602244038; bh=fAolqq10ljD1j4tFS+jQNd1MTbOttKNMWWLqUGv3CiQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1A9xAzrWsMotio2Ic/HR61pE9DPi5P7DlAmD4hP0PlBSknFIjtFPVshJVeszoTcoG y2bYLwNV9X/31JaP6xEUrkWVns6V6SoYJ1/v8H9HrpbZvIFkI4hLE0VrILduL9iuGS ScfQZ5FdHK3nb09cC5lUxFq57HeIuwz8kQaGoLoc=
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 04:47:18 -0700
From: Thomas Fossati <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <reply+ACTMJUOC4J2H6N7A2T444YF5RQXMNEVBNHHCVTIOG4@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <draft-ietf-sacm-coswid@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/27@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f804dc6b3d59_5019b47443f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: thomas-fossati
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/Vcm9kL6xJurkhyViyq2glzrW5gg>
Subject: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:47:22 -0000

It is not clear to me whether the intent is that SWID and CoSWID are equivalent data models?

If so, I think `entity-entry` is a bit problematic in this respect because `entity-extension` and SWID's `Meta(s)` are not the same thing.  An `entity-extension` could be constrained to resemble a `Meta` but this doesn't seem to be the case, at least in the version of the draft I'm reading (i.e., -15).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/27