IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Consensus call on SACM WG way forward (March 2021)

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Wed, 10 March 2021 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB323A111C for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:30:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y5piCGp64aHl for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA6D3A1119 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id l12so23759305wry.2 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:30:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4IiJAgbLaZpK567BPw3vTozi5+e8f7ekXDybfXh9cUI=; b=sZse67LlRVXUvqJj+x5b5S+7cFqq5cJQLWduhZE1FsLnJAH68AIGUhryAHrTrTXXMe oovdMifnALKexfMKPoSR82cqt+/7fHxHKAltKRX/9CR8ogJ5hzp4uaPSAV+cfeJ/t9uG O9gV45pY/TUnbUkrmUaupCIlBgXb+sB67QR7W7URJspONr4EGRMz1k16cNAB/ps6Hevf ju73/NYeSZVUv0egon4H0IsYPdDpPko36MYkOsMurM7gbqFS0Uw3MmWoGOdkWKg+461t bMteetM8KxKIevUrCrsWdRAKOhbkpL6Fva0XGXa2zeA3KQLMjm85fBCYQpTIiyMWgJ63 cJGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4IiJAgbLaZpK567BPw3vTozi5+e8f7ekXDybfXh9cUI=; b=S/z4wt/XK46oY9xGbW/wsaeZp6P/T+z0fsZCmI3xAJeGiFqerCHaWXCfr22aa0MfiY YZ2hNErgGH221uGJNvThkH54a8Gc2FqJZiFe4ZQBhygicWhfk58LXMBEo5T2k0T6/bmd 4noz5R1BX4dqpLjCdBAI2b/GuuMGmuzxv5pI6jVYsYYDmiAbH21BE8BhrSbfe5O7Zovp WOIVJ71Kv0CrRW8UEmSAiTbO0sIN8dtjvm+ICf4EpALuEg5E+0Yfsw3aybEqpxI+LLJl /z+O4hEUbttmybP9x3F1MQAKydFEK1XLfyLuuYm6ZiD3XaTsJgbG7IpdPGZd2NnCqWNi dZ3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532z1o9dr5yHn6tokS1yHcoziG1C74HQbdvPv89iP0ZaPQBy+N0P V0J2NT2nTQohcTyECTwCEDLIPfQcApeZU6LVjls=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbY/xh6NAXuBxjJG9yh5SVRgci7DGBBrs6/TuOk3bY0CqzASg0b6DLreQsx7vnZt7F7r8GKZ66uqBFF0I37A8=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:b1c9:: with SMTP id r9mr4239501wra.51.1615390213001; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:30:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO6PR06MB70588EA9A40AA42F537D0FF8C2919@CO6PR06MB7058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR06MB70588EA9A40AA42F537D0FF8C2919@CO6PR06MB7058.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:30:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN40gSsO4356WHAgt=JROFuaMD=pdh0_ikX=qAvrZ_duAP0PJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Cc: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1d40e05bd30570d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/Yz7JNthg_MNs3btQoabM2pnIYvE>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Consensus call on SACM WG way forward (March 2021)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:30:17 -0000

+1

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:55 AM Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:

> SACM WG members,
>
>
>
> During today’s SACM WG meeting, we discussed a way ahead for the SACM
> working group. The proposal that we settled on is:
>
>
>
>    - Drop all the milestones which aren’t CoSWID or Architecture related
>    - Revise the milestone on SACM Architecture to be “Submit SACM
>    Architecture to IESG” by December 2021
>    - Add a milestone “Close or re-charter WG if all planned milestones
>    have not progressed to at least the IESG” by January 2022
>
> This email initiates a one week consensus call on this way forward. This
> will give the working group members that were not present a chance to
> review the chair slides that discussed the motivation, the meeting
> recording, and the meeting minutes (which should be posted later today).
>
>
>
> Please indicate on the mailing list your opinion on this way forward. This
> consensus call will close on next Friday at 19 March 2021.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Karen and Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email