Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch] Should Evaluator be pulled out of downstream uses? (#6)

adammontville <notifications@github.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE14120089 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 05:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9aoUOCwgzccr for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 05:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B875A1200D7 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 05:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 05:50:00 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1570625400; bh=XrJY43djEPJeaHsz3XB+XHkYnfDu7em79of7+kMUXJ0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=sRjBrM3ysCIriqR3KMRp/KlfhQPL71kj+HMc2RU/wFRnBoCxtnfbCj5U7XKPOinqJ DFH/0zr9BWvCCcNdrXEibhX8WMDsOLTY2XY76lsmxI+XzJvf7IrP3lnKc4o0Ct9TrF WWV//hdWuEeZ1vWunjjaor4DASqJsJ5iIzcZhyuQ=
From: adammontville <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch <reply+ACTMJUIGHZOIKZ3LRXKKE4F3VMMAREVBNHHBYK4K4A@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch <draft-ietf-sacm-arch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/issues/6/539985975@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/issues/6@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/issues/6@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d9dd778a3a0a_27263fed55acd9601460d3"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: adammontville
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/fWTExBxUXwpJAGjx-kRxj_6jhT4>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch] Should Evaluator be pulled out of downstream uses? (#6)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 12:50:03 -0000

Seems to have been already done.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-arch/issues/6#issuecomment-539985975