Re: [sacm] Clarification from last IETF Session

Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com> Fri, 02 April 2021 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BD43A12F7 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 05:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=1.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWQ_YmLG1JHa for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 05:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8343A12F4 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 05:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id d12so4796431oiw.12 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 05:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=0Ms1qQ5LGSTPkOIVCoHvCjzy0jOqZA1LjnndGoHHtUE=; b=cnA8imdWXnVwYw6SRXj0uilTOSWAXFt2+cOURts7ruQIdAH2QFgvGCntlf4hTuRZ+r 7bA0NX0b9YlqdqapB+FIx6EEWGp+OO+yZFfkmOtkDKTLbK8RLJBV5xTRo+bridyDTQZo p8f9BxIplfX64kGEnMSJDqyJLkEPGlN08e2TALw6LnhgcznGFxm9HUqWsa/qp15RaON/ nsdix45p41czObKJATFYvVJuIbYpfoLnHxNFSTwWDsz9v5Gfrto3iPbrnYfN2SWlzax2 t/QuopZL3fmcOD0RvFlwko7QmWAXLiPChbjYln/K+razTHctIKrZMw8qS1++tywSVq+k pBIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=0Ms1qQ5LGSTPkOIVCoHvCjzy0jOqZA1LjnndGoHHtUE=; b=neDtPhOWIiA1Hubgl/SkhAujqBSmixBcafn22VNYLDG0Be5kNmTjmhdM1hR1qNLvjy h0Rd580tE0xizYw7OQqyL3hmKA2k2mJnCSwhdXlcSaG9k+6wvHu/dRG39hqG9sch1pIq BRTG92Spd9yncMW/vCSuGOBsrqUsQcfeXe+W6SVaw3xiOw62YqfvLGXaMQhicgQ9hRBF vcMNrf9ziYyOZ/+A7Yp3cLs8IbiYCHukR8tzBHyrhL+vvy1ai5kYnBUdTNbe/1xcRdba 262/dJQyfs9UfeMrwS2iaTISHvn3N4PzTzviwwDG1v07v5fqP14yOmDVy+eZxR3RpYdW dcyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dJqQczoUU13JsWQb8Z0q+/bRoAuRdMyMp5csuSoUNZLVDa4kY b9pC4YsuWNd3cVc9rTCUvB07mhG7nnI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjNzLX3EECk+y2oCWTD6eBGUbo7R0vKipz7zI7R1x3s+y7x6U9mAJZBVE0MfDh31SbDz7flA==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:6545:: with SMTP id j5mr9528493oiw.31.1617366610059; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 05:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbkpro-2043-amontville.lan (cpe-70-121-86-117.austin.res.rr.com. [70.121.86.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n12sm1878741otq.42.2021.04.02.05.30.09 for <sacm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 05:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 07:30:08 -0500
References: <49BDC54D-DD6F-45A4-9B7B-395A3E9E2E50@gmail.com>
To: sacm <sacm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <49BDC54D-DD6F-45A4-9B7B-395A3E9E2E50@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <570DB4ED-9D63-43BA-A290-F3428470DE42@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/iVV5mYWt5pBunEL8bMGbBZgj5sI>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Clarification from last IETF Session
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 12:30:14 -0000

No one has any recollection of this (or can confirm that I’m imagining things)?

> On Mar 24, 2021, at 11:52 AM, Adam Montville <adam.montville.sdo@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All:
> 
> I seem to remember, during the architecture discussion at our last session, that there was someone else (other than CIS) interested in implementing at least a piece of the architecture. Did I invent this in my own mind, or is there some truth to it?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Adam