Return-Path: X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C9E12D0E7 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:02:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.195 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mitre.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nemm6oFGiXFb for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:02:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org (smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org [192.52.194.136]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C4A12D0BE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:02:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AC137BC021 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:02:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imshyb01.MITRE.ORG (imshyb01.mitre.org [129.83.29.2]) by smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258346C04DC for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:02:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imshyb01.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.2) by imshyb01.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:02:13 -0400 Received: from gcc01-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.140.19.249) by imshyb01.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 20:02:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mitre.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-mitre-org; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=OPZmry6kYBdGmHud9pfxloGwGaa7xxE7KGJlGx5R9IQ=; b=tMqI2ey4/AgHnnVlK2blnUmy7Xoy4dk4eqJCHM36Nl+hOYBtNoh3oRvQjlrwglJxIVaglnwYiPxG/51vGDn3CnhYPMEi/1kduXA6s5l3m29R8vksj14tgbpDjoUOSQsr3OfP+xoah9niGqSRvTnGWEzBigd7ka4cnRRWxd/P0J8= Received: from SN1PR09MB1085.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.166.68.139) by SN1PR09MB1088.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.166.68.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.477.8; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:02:12 +0000 Received: from SN1PR09MB1085.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.68.139]) by SN1PR09MB1085.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.68.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0477.012; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:02:12 +0000 From: "Haynes, Dan" To: "sacm@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: FOR REVIEW: IM Merge - Insert Section 3 of I-D IM into WG IM Thread-Index: AdGgF0aEbxJlOmDyQ3uvWwPOFR+Sew== Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:02:11 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=mitre.org; x-originating-ip: [192.160.51.89] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d2502859-c71b-4886-abc5-08d36e2f2f29 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR09MB1088; 5:2jeLNDRl+ZAl5Y/gsLxNC+hmsBQSdmoBF3Zx8BbNzCwfZcAoXDuwYjl8x+meN6c9U4EigbLhjcXvkF5E9pVAsG58e7AW4CAW4mtP5IuUJXDbNj+SF9seF93BAV9/8kO4eLsjYB+GJpXrymn/XRHPfw==; 24:Km7uEb/f6HzAfX+fxzLfmV2cT8ToUfG7u8FEXLYhVsKB8HrmXeGZlev1k0pFh6dV5J+LMOgGBFiYmCfzV7tzKPrfiLzALLezMkjLKELAWG8=; 7:bI1W2kzt2g95DblukgeP3xzyW3WD42K2ots2iSVOHw1BKR5YbyxTkFBDKhsxeYrRH1Co9IqU2ZpETOW02tquvLhX2kpN1AcH2oa2FymPR8JWeDkTGzN2M1aAtea2U7aX/2K1MwK956CncI3oOlKrxDt7SrdhAPeeydi2nWrxRbFKISBweq5uwDgScsseoM84 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR09MB1088; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(9101521072)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:SN1PR09MB1088; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR09MB1088; x-forefront-prvs: 0925081676 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(52084003)(189998001)(107886002)(110136002)(76576001)(450100001)(74316001)(5002640100001)(5003600100002)(9686002)(2501003)(81156013)(1096002)(81166005)(5630700001)(66066001)(77096005)(2900100001)(15975445007)(87936001)(5640700001)(3280700002)(3660700001)(99286002)(2906002)(19625215002)(5008740100001)(19580395003)(33656002)(16236675004)(229853001)(19617315012)(11100500001)(2351001)(5004730100002)(790700001)(102836003)(86362001)(6116002)(3846002)(19300405004)(1730700002)(92566002)(586003)(1220700001)(122556002)(50986999)(54356999)(10400500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR09MB1088; H:SN1PR09MB1085.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN1PR09MB1085FD756D8BD15F077AB5D9A5640SN1PR09MB1085namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Apr 2016 00:02:12.0650 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: c620dc48-1d50-4952-8b39-df4d54d74d82 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR09MB1088 X-OriginatorOrg: mitre.org Archived-At: Subject: [sacm] FOR REVIEW: IM Merge - Insert Section 3 of I-D IM into WG IM X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SACM WG mail list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:02:17 -0000 --_000_SN1PR09MB1085FD756D8BD15F077AB5D9A5640SN1PR09MB1085namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Out of the SACM session at IETF 95, Henk, Nancy, and I spent some time merg= ing the text between the I-D IM [1] and the WG IM [2]. The result of that = merger is captured in an updated version of the I-D IM [3] (note: the name = of the draft was updated per Adam's request on the list [4]). Out of that work, we would like to propose that Section 3 of the I-D IM [3]= be inserted between Sections 2 and 3 of the WG IM [2]. Does this seem rea= sonable? Are there any objections to this change? Please review and provide any feedback by Tuesday May 3rd. Thanks, Danny [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cam-winget-sacm-information-mode= l/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-camwinget-sacm-information-model= / [4] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sacm/current/msg03905.html --_000_SN1PR09MB1085FD756D8BD15F077AB5D9A5640SN1PR09MB1085namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Out of the SACM session at IETF 95, Henk, Nancy, and= I spent some time merging the text between the I-D IM [1] and the WG IM [2= ].  The result of that merger is captured in an updated version of the= I-D IM [3] (note: the name of the draft was updated per Adam’s request on the list [4]).

 

Out of that work, we would like to propose that Sect= ion 3 of the I-D IM [3] be inserted between Sections 2 and 3 of the WG IM [= 2].  Does this seem reasonable?  Are there any objections to this= change?

 

Please review and provide any feedback by Tuesday Ma= y 3rd.

 

Thanks,

Danny

 

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cam-winget-sacm-information-model/

[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/

[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-camwinget-sacm-information-model/

[4] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sacm/current/msg03905.html

 

 

--_000_SN1PR09MB1085FD756D8BD15F077AB5D9A5640SN1PR09MB1085namp_--