Re: [sacm] WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-coswid

"Fuchs, Andreas" <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de> Wed, 17 July 2019 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7111203E2 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4COZC_J8ZR-u for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.72.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801BC1203CF for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (exch2010c.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.34]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id x6HDNnSU030732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:23:50 +0200
Received: from EXCH2010B.sit.fraunhofer.de ([169.254.2.57]) by exch2010c.sit.fraunhofer.de ([169.254.3.92]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:23:44 +0200
From: "Fuchs, Andreas" <andreas.fuchs@sit.fraunhofer.de>
To: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-coswid
Thread-Index: AdU8otuN34k2bANWT4O5ioiFQPoJjA==
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:23:44 +0000
Message-ID: <9F48E1A823B03B4790B7E6E69430724D0163AE8643@EXCH2010B.sit.fraunhofer.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [141.12.89.204]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/wiqtIzyHDA9gVDZXDFIF-gImcZQ>
Subject: Re: [sacm] WGLC for draft-ietf-sacm-coswid
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:23:56 -0000

I followed this work for uite some time and fully support it.
I consider this to be an important contribution to attestation procedures;
i.e. reference value convenience in security automation contexts.

Thanks,
Andreas