[SAFE] Keepalive duration and radio access protocols

"Xavier Marjou" <xavier.marjou@gmail.com> Mon, 03 December 2007 21:21 UTC

Return-path: <safe-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzIjh-0003Mo-BW; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:21:53 -0500
Received: from safe by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzIjg-0003Mh-9x for safe-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:21:52 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzIjf-0003JA-JT for safe@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:21:51 -0500
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzIjf-0005S8-6c for safe@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:21:51 -0500
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k40so7881297wah for <safe@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:21:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=zYtV4vgXEwMWE8h+QW8Rs+HwgtkoSxxJsU/V9M0E+60=; b=oxTId3AK44dAAwdt+cotR7mvgFZnCVaVKib8UNfj/BPZxo1eMHJcoESn3hvN9IHNmIaYHV8YjR+iGSrg9QPTX7eS3e2KfwA6evmRF4dkmLm2/dGkGcabzy2X4dzI2qEnZEOmoswX6//nMCLjYnMlGGmQ42bSsdSJQCxuPHTFJWU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=fidgL6sVbBWWeTnSWlmGu7cxfmiyqPXBRr7/pALimnqj+WVWjBXwv6D984qPJ862WLlbKz2ovlrmW9RFrshJk7FQ5bt3cwi3izcahB6MgQ4x897hwxD4S9JQnglp4L5aBvV+H1FUHNM+8qQr7aPINyL7XWWdblJzYRBwgvpqQUY=
Received: by 10.115.89.1 with SMTP id r1mr4175618wal.1196716904531; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.72.7 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:21:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <458913680712031321t63482dlcf6438e7aaeebbab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:21:44 -0800
From: Xavier Marjou <xavier.marjou@gmail.com>
To: safe@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Subject: [SAFE] Keepalive duration and radio access protocols
X-BeenThere: safe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Self-Address Fixing Evolution <safe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe>, <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/safe>
List-Post: <mailto:safe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe>, <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: safe-bounces@ietf.org

With regards to today's meeting, I would have the following question:
Isn't there a risk that reducing the keepalive traffic impacts
radio-access protocols? (e.g. with things like loss of radio access
bearer)

Cheers,
Xavier


_______________________________________________
SAFE mailing list
SAFE@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe