Re: [SAFE] Keepalive duration and radio access protocols
Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> Mon, 03 December 2007 22:06 UTC
Return-path: <safe-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzJQh-0001tT-GT; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:06:19 -0500
Received: from safe by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzJQg-0001sz-Bj for safe-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:06:18 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzJQf-0001sp-NI for safe@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:06:17 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzJQf-00012D-BK for safe@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:06:17 -0500
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id lB3M6SQi003724 for <safe@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:06:29 -0600
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 00:05:48 +0200
Received: from essapo-nirac253122.europe.nokia.com ([10.162.253.122]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 00:05:47 +0200
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Organization: Nokia TP-SP-SWD
To: safe@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [SAFE] Keepalive duration and radio access protocols
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:01:55 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <458913680712031321t63482dlcf6438e7aaeebbab@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <458913680712031321t63482dlcf6438e7aaeebbab@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200712040001.55647.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2007 22:05:48.0230 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8EC9E60:01C835F8]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
X-BeenThere: safe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Self-Address Fixing Evolution <safe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe>, <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/safe>
List-Post: <mailto:safe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe>, <mailto:safe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: safe-bounces@ietf.org
Le Monday 03 December 2007 23:21:44 ext Xavier Marjou, vous avez écrit : > With regards to today's meeting, I would have the following question: > Isn't there a risk that reducing the keepalive traffic impacts > radio-access protocols? (e.g. with things like loss of radio access > bearer) I have been able to keep a 3G PDP context for hours while not sending any IP packets through it. In any case, if the radio technology cannot keep up with long delays between keep-alives, it cannot be used by battery-powered devices. Considering that the overwhelming majority of said devices are actually battery-powered, I am pretty confident that the technology can already cope with such time-distant keep-alives (and if it cannot, then some other SIP-using SDOs have a big big problem). -- Rémi Denis-Courmont _______________________________________________ SAFE mailing list SAFE@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/safe
- [SAFE] Keepalive duration and radio access protoc… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [SAFE] Keepalive duration and radio access pr… Rémi Denis-Courmont