IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] The registry structure

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 02 May 2014 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@ariadne.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F201A0957 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtoIYWKNFPUQ for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6226E1A6F68 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id x9Zu1n0040QuhwU5CARYoD; Fri, 02 May 2014 22:25:32 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.34.72.61]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xARY1n0071KKtkw3NARYbl; Fri, 02 May 2014 22:25:32 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s42MPVra015909; Fri, 2 May 2014 18:25:31 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s42MPVPD015908; Fri, 2 May 2014 18:25:31 -0400
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 18:25:31 -0400
Message-Id: <201405022225.s42MPVPD015908@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <53627D19.1070009@alum.mit.edu> (pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu)
References: <201404251959.s3PJxXdj027687@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <535AC0F1.3050906@alum.mit.edu> <201404302209.s3UM9xPV002457@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <53627D19.1070009@alum.mit.edu>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1399069532; bh=nwp8RDynKlDrqT9342kgJ9yF0CKEX9Ll9bEClkSS7e8=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Date:Message-Id:From:To: Subject; b=sEtcYdW54XOlwFJlZNeujG6ReAjzto9dKzX0ID3ZBKG1B8Pt01b7cXRQJdeI16IzY HUuEDtRhVsoQhW2khRoDRiwSORBuokvDZaAO/CS/6pyOOhUBozZKCA7npYJN2PFC3M UE7PDwbFbRmitGUUKNorj+KGv+RIjcSLKUfjf1ZEDDZyh0dKJ7PDcOAU5u92f2aCv/ IfPAHVShdt9irSjggGgCdJrK0HEaefdQY+tcSDxL5UjUuOJQ2L+KzSsgQx5iUKq/it /Qg7XpTgfv3gL3uZ6EgBAGmpYFzp9HGAJ9i4bPdm2XDEzNfT5vi0VFnqaiHe7z0pEf GpY+w+Wkw1smg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/-Woh8YsYS4bVxj2GDkEUg9c7oYU
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] The registry structure
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 22:26:03 -0000

> From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
> 
> I agree with your proposal, except that the names of the tables are 
> quite cumbersome. How about:
> 
> s/Alert URN Identifiers alert-categories/Alert URN alert-categories/
> s/Alert URN Identifiers alert-identifiers/Alert URN alert-identifiers/

I agree.  The draft uses the term

    "alert" URN

in dozens of places.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email