Re: [salud] Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 08 January 2014 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F31A1AE346 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:47:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJqnwb4CrnWv for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg21.mgmt.ericsson.se (sessmg21.ericsson.net [193.180.251.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B871AE342 for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:47:15 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb28-b7f318e00000037c-79-52cd108975d9
Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg21.mgmt.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 24.95.00892.9801DC25; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:47:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.201]) by ESESSHC008.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.42]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:46:28 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "salud@ietf.org" <salud@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [salud] Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09
Thread-Index: Ac8LoI2GwVZiq6LbSqq5Xri0pXR59AATzaeXAAEbhwAAFneGMA==
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:46:28 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C5F00F8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C5EF0E7@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <201401072131.s07LVQZs2347719@shell01.TheWorld.com> <52CC8796.8050102@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <52CC8796.8050102@alum.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW6nwNkggy2zFCxWbDjAanG34wCj A5PH3/cfmDyWLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXx6vgcpoJpghVX1u9gbWC8yNvFyMEhIWAi 8bxRuIuRE8gUk7hwbz0biC0kcIJRYvkBjy5GLiB7MaPEk2NtbCD1bAIWEt3/tEFqRAS8Jc5u awarFxbwlfh3u48VpEREIEBiVn8MRImTxP+r55hAbBYBFYnZS66zgti8QOXtfyaxQIxfyihx te0U2BxOAR2JpzN6wWxGoHu+n1oD1swsIC5x68l8Jog7BSSW7DnPDGGLSrx8/I8VwlaUuDp9 OVS9jsSC3Z/YIGxtiWULXzNDLBaUODnzCcsERtFZSMbOQtIyC0nLLCQtCxhZVjFKFqcWF+em Gxnq5abnluilFmUmFxfn5+kVp25iBMbKwS2/NXYwdl+zP8QozcGiJM5bNbMzSEggPbEkNTs1 tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVAOjVJCaiU/q00tJ6bv2SWw7pSMYUmkteNXy6Do3n6BTvkUzFdlN NvBO6Q9XKZbTM5H8JlEj3nHtU1hn883de8RFbb7N8D4s+vNfBcthvovB79SL/q7cUf9sv0rT z/aow3Zhnt+XX2XePKO7/vYlr4N10ld311gxGxrucjA/+vPrxOjySmGpHm4lluKMREMt5qLi RABZ0ccuYwIAAA==
Subject: Re: [salud] Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:47:17 -0000

Hi,

The text suggested by Paul looks ok to me.

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: salud [mailto:salud-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
Sent: 8. tammikuuta 2014 1:03
To: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09

On 1/7/14 4:31 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:

>> Section 1.1. says:
>>
>> "It is not possible to provide semantic indications or names for
>>   rendering characteristics that signals the intent and allows the
>>   recipient UA to decide how to render the received information in an
>>   appropriate way."
>>
>> The sentence is very confusing. Why not simply say something like:
>>
>>   "It is not possible to define semantics associated with a given tone."
>
> The sentence is confusing, but you haven't captured the meaning we 
> want (perhaps because we confused you!).  What we are concerned about 
> the "specifier" can't state what the semantics of the tone are and let 
> the renderer choose the appropriate tone.
>
> How about:
>
>   "There is no method to signal the semantic intention of the tone
>    (without signaling a specific tone) and allowing the recipient UA
>    to decide what tone to use to signal the intention.  Similarly,
>    there is no method to signal particular rendering features (such as
>    short duration, delay, or country-specific conventions) without
>    signaling a specific tone."

I don't think that quite gets it either, because it implies that the semantics need to be indicated using a tone. Part of the point is that the indication might use other modalities.

How about:

  "There is no method to signal the semantic intention of the alert
   and allowing the recipient UA form of alert indication (such as
   a particular tone, vibration, or visual display) to use to signal
   the intention.  Similarly, there is no method to signal particular
   rendering features (such as short duration, delay, or country-
   specific conventions)."

	Thanks,
	Paul




_______________________________________________
salud mailing list
salud@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud