Re: [salud] First draft of changes for "expert review"

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 21 May 2014 19:23 UTC

Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:23:19 -0400
Message-Id: <201405211923.s4LJNJdx001102@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <537CD09A.7050705@alum.mit.edu> (pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu)
References: <201405192318.s4JNIKaH003254@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <537CD09A.7050705@alum.mit.edu>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/6dHZ3rnm_YZQnRxI-kZe-03mZIk
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] First draft of changes for "expert review"
Precedence: list

[as an author]

> From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
> 
> > This is a first draft of changes needed to change the control of
> > alert-info URNs from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review".  I think
> > I've found all places in the text that would need to be modified.
> 
> I've looked at 5226, and I think we might want Specification Required 
> rather than Expert Review. Specification Required also calls for expert 
> review, but in addition requires there to be a publicly available 
> specification.

That makes sense to me.

> > A new <alert-identifier> that has more than one <alert-ind-part> is
> > the extension of a parent <alert-identifier>, which is determined by
> 
> Is "extension" the right word here?
> I think perhaps "refinement" or "narrowing".

Yes, I've heard the word "refinement" used to mean "create a smaller
sub-category of an existing category".  E.g., "refine a distinction".

Dale

[salud] First draft of changes for "expert review" Dale R. Worley
Re: [salud] First draft of changes for "expert re… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [salud] First draft of changes for "expert re… Dale R. Worley