[salud] Draft revision from IESG call

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Thu, 29 May 2014 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@ariadne.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EFD1A6F7C for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 08:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEmvcH7_enzA for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 08:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320EC1A6F7D for <salud@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 08:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7qDu1o0031vXlb855rbg5J; Thu, 29 May 2014 15:35:40 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.34.72.61]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7rbf1o00j1KKtkw3drbgVG; Thu, 29 May 2014 15:35:40 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s4TFZdaj017562 for <salud@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:35:39 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s4TFZdRJ017561; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:35:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:35:39 -0400
Message-Id: <201405291535.s4TFZdRJ017561@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: salud@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1401377740; bh=VsJMESFZ1OK6ENGpQfnMeRTLfF6Gwd1+FupHCheOlX8=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Date:Message-Id:From:To: Subject; b=G0wPCtVIvKqe9u5hBAa6dnnkJp5j6Koes9gXGupXhcy74HabGzPdvOp505XjsRIYT oTC72wZoJuGMfvFJZ7l5vs4LjXXeb8ne2UryXGSZ5kYaGshXZZagtdUuY3aMwzaHUo SSS8KkzhbMr67qtxEO5CFVIq9dn4WL4PWhiHOFbKkfLWMArp2QISfh76w2Tj5e/lt6 2ovXQtNVllID5CPhNxG+XFToEMrxCqC3ej5rUdoGXh4C5a/9JdExhwTYo7Fk+ZOT7y sKc/P8atuU0AbLEtfjyftPEn42uO0P7kmHvEQoPLcLLSbGgnbRXvhzyxlN/lhzfUUU tfP206lDFjgLg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/7GVrDMcTmgNUONRb2vd0_Wr45pA
Subject: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:35:48 -0000

[as an author]

I've assembled a draft incorporating many of the changes that have
been discussed.  This isn't an official "revision 12.1" because I am
not the editor -- it's just to show the wording of the current
proposals and what the whole text looks like with those changes.

I've attempted to include everything which is tentatively agreed upon,
that is, every proposed change for which there seems to be no
outstanding disagreements.  What I haven't included is:

- what <provider> values are

- the policy for creating new standard URNs

- the exact description of the IANA registry (because that depends on
  the policy question)

- the guidelines for creating new public or private URNs (because that
  involves the policy question)

The one proposal that I have omitted is one from the IESG to move the
requirements to an appendix, because it appears that incorporating
requirements into body sections is common practice.

As far as I know, all objections and comments from the Secdir and
Gen-art reviews and the IESG call are in one of the above three
categories.

The XML and text versions can be obtained from

https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt

https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.xml

You can see the diffs between revision 12 and this draft with

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt

Dale